Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26048939›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Implications of Genome-Based Discrimination between Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes Strains for Bacterial Taxonomy.

Michael R Weigand, Angela Pena-Gonzalez, Timothy B Shirey, Robin G Broeker, Maliha K Ishaq, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis, Brian H Raphael

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Detection ofVirulence · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Unintended consequences: Renaming botulinum neurotoxin-producing species of clostridium and related species.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Specific Isolation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic comparisons confirmFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel Lytic Enzyme of Prophage Origin fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Distinctive Evolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Endogenous CRISPR-Cas Systems in Group IFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Whole Genome Sequence-Based Identification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael R WeigandSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Angela Pena-GonzalezSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Timothy B ShireyEnteric Diseases Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Robin G BroekerEnteric Diseases Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Maliha K IshaqEnteric Diseases Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Konstantinos T KonstantinidisSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Brian H RaphaelEnteric Diseases Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA BRaphael@cdc.gov.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taxonomic classification of Clostridium botulinum is based on the production of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), while closely related, nontoxic organisms are classified as Clostridium sporogenes. However, this taxonomic organization does not accurately mirror phylogenetic relationships between these species. A phylogenetic reconstruction using 2,016 orthologous genes shared among strains of C. botulinum group I and C. sporogenes clearly separated these two species into discrete clades which showed ∼93% average nucleotide identity (ANI) between them. Clustering of strains based on the presence of variable orthologs revealed 143 C. sporogenes clade-specific genetic signatures, a subset of which were further evaluated for their ability to correctly classify a panel of presumptive C. sporogenes strains by PCR. Genome sequencing of several C. sporogenes strains lacking these signatures confirmed that they clustered with C. botulinum strains in a core genome phylogenetic tree. Our analysis also identified C. botulinum strains that contained C. sporogenes clade-specific signatures and phylogenetically clustered with C. sporogenes strains. The genome sequences of two bont/B2-containing strains belonging to the C. sporogenes clade contained regions with similarity to a bont-bearing plasmid (pCLD), while two different strains belonging to the C. botulinum clade carried bont/B2 on the chromosome. These results indicate that bont/B2 was likely acquired by C. sporogenes strains through horizontal gene transfer. The genome-based classification of these species used to identify candidate genes for the development of rapid assays for molecular identification may be applicable to additional bacterial species that are challenging with respect to their classification.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialChromosomesClostridiumCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialGenetic LociGenotypeMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlasmidsSequence Analysis, DNASequence HomologyDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26048939
PMCPMC4510194
OpenAlexW2151315920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.