Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26048550›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)2015

Carbon Substrates: A Stable Foundation for Biomolecular Arrays.

Matthew R Lockett, Lloyd M Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew R LockettDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599; email: mlockett@unc.edu.
Lloyd M Smith

Funding

Light-directed synthesis of genes &other biomoleculesR01HG003275 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CERRINA, FRANCESCO · 2004 to 2007
$4.5M
QPASS: Quantitative Parallel Aptamer Selection SystemU54DK093467 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI SMITH, LLOYD M, SOH, HYONGSOK TOM · 2011 to 2013
$3.2M
SNP Analysis by Surface Invasive Cleavage on DNA ArraysR01HG002298 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SMITH, LLOYD M · 2001 to 2007
$2.7M
HIGH FIDELITY SURFACES AND DNA ARRAYSR01EB000269 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI SMITH, LLOYD M · 2002 to 2003
$814k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002298NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003275NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG02298NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000269NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK093467NIDDK NIH HHS U54DK093467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since their advent in the early 1990s, microarray technologies have developed into a powerful and ubiquitous platform for biomolecular analysis. Microarrays consist of three major elements: the substrate upon which they are constructed, the chemistry employed to attach biomolecules, and the biomolecules themselves. Although glass substrates and silane-based attachment chemistries are used for the vast majority of current microarray platforms, these materials suffer from severe limitations in stability, due to hydrolysis of both the substrate material itself and of the silyl ether linkages employed for attachment. These limitations in stability compromise assay performance and render impossible many potential microarray applications. We describe here a suite of alternative carbon-based substrates and associated attachment chemistries for microarray fabrication. The substrates themselves, as well as the carbon-carbon bond-based attachment chemistries, offer greatly increased chemical stability, enabling a myriad of novel applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiotechnologyCarbonGlassHumansMicroarray AnalysisSurface PropertiesCarbonamorphous carbondiamondmicroarraymonolayersurface chemistry

Identifiers

PMID26048550
PMCPMC6287745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.