Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26048460›Full record

ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2016

Career Development Institute with Enhanced Mentoring: A Revisit.

David J Kupfer, Alan F Schatzberg, Leslie O Dunn, Andrea K Schneider, Tara L Moore, Melissa DeRosier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mentorship, Sponsorship, and Coaching in Academic Medicine: Essential Elements of Faculty Development.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. It Is Never Too Late to Collaborate: Remaining Academically Productive at Career's End by Sustaining Adult Play.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  7. Long day's journey into sleep.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Participant perspectives on a seminar-based research career development program and its role in career independence.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Advanced Research Institute (ARI): An Effective Model for Career Development and Transition to Independence.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Becoming an Academic Researcher in Psychiatry: A View From the Trenches.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David J KupferUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. kupferdj@upmc.edu.
Alan F SchatzbergStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Leslie O DunnUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Andrea K SchneiderMarquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Tara L MooreUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Melissa DeRosier3-C Institute for Social Development, Cary, NC, USA.

Funding

The Career Development Institute for PsychiatryR25MH090947 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Erika E Forbes, ALAN F. SCHATZBERG · 2011 to 2026
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH090947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe need for innovative methods to promote training, advancement, and retention of clinical and translational investigators in order to build a pipeline of trainees to focus on mental health-relevant research careers is pressing. The specific aim of the Career Development Institute for Psychiatry is to provide the necessary skill set and support to a nationally selected broad-based group of young psychiatrists and PhD researchers to launch and maintain successful research careers in academic psychiatry. The program targets such career skills as writing, negotiating, time management, juggling multiple demanding responsibilities, networking, project management, responsible conduct of research, and career goal setting. The current program builds on the previous program by adding a longitudinal, long-distance, virtual mentoring, and training program, seen as integral components to sustaining these career skills.

methodsCareer development activities occur in four phases over a 24-month period for each annual class of up to 18 participants: online baseline career and skills self-assessment and goal setting, preparations for 4-day in-person workshop, long-distance structured mentoring and online continued learning, peer-mentoring activities, and post-program career progress and process evaluation. Program instructors and mentors consist of faculty from the University of Pittsburgh and Stanford University as well as successful past program graduates from other universities as peer mentors. A comprehensive website facilitates long-distance activities to occur online. Continued training occurs via webinars every other month by experts discussing topics selected for the needs of each particular class. Personally assigned mentors meet individually bimonthly with participants via a secure web-based "mentor center" that allows mentor dyads to collaborate, share, review, and discuss career goals and research activities.

resultsPreliminary results after the first 24 months are favorable. Almost uniformly, participants felt the program was very helpful. They had regular contact with their long-distance mentor at least every 2 months over the 2-year period. At the end of the 2-year period, the majority of participants had full-time faculty appointments with K-award support and very few were doing primarily clinical work.

conclusionsThe longitudinal program of education, training, mentoring, peer support, and communications for individuals making the transition to academic research should increase the number of scientists committed to research careers in mental health.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceHumansMentoringPsychiatryResearch PersonnelStaff DevelopmentAcademic careersCareer developmentCareers in psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID26048460
PMCPMC4670819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.