Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26048348›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2015

Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in Thai patients with chronic diseases.

Phantipa Sakthong, Nontapat Sonsa-Ardjit, Pattarin Sukarnjanaset, Wipaporn Munpan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Psychometric properties comparison between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in the general Thai population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Understanding the Impact of Long COVID on the Lives of Thai University Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Phantipa SakthongFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Phantipa.S@pharm.chula.ac.th.
Nontapat Sonsa-ArdjitFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pattarin SukarnjanasetFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wipaporn MunpanFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDue to the problem of high ceiling effects of the EQ-5D-3L, the EQ-5D-5L was developed. However, little was known about the full psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate its practicality, reliability, validity, and responsiveness in Thai patients with chronic diseases.

methodsOne thousand one hundred and fifty-six adults taking a medicine at least 3 months were identified from three university hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand, between July 2014 and March 2015. Practicality was evaluated by administration times and ceiling effects. Test-retest reliability was assessed using weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Validity was tested with correlations between the EQ-5D-5L and WHOQoL-BREF and SF-12v2, and known-groups validity. Responsiveness was measured with standardized effect sizes (SES).

resultsThe mean administration time was approximately 2 min, and the ceiling effect of the EQ-5D-5L index was 13.6 %. The weighted kappa values and ICC of the EQ-5D-5L were 0.48-0.61 and 0.82, respectively. Similar dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L had higher correlations with those of WHOQoL-BREF and SF-12v2. As expected, elderly, female, low-educated, unemployed, higher number of comorbidities and medicines, patients' perception of poor disease control, and having an adverse drug reaction tended to have poorer EQ-5D-5L scores. The SES of EQ-5D-5L index and EQ-VAS were considered small (0.33-0.42) for the improved group. For the worsened group, the SES of the EQ-5D-5L index were considered small (-0.29) but that of the EQ-VAS considered large (-0.82).

conclusionsThe EQ-5D-5L was practical, reliable, valid, and responsive in Thai patients with chronic diseases.

Indexed as

AdultAsian PeopleChronic DiseaseComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPain MeasurementPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesEQ-5D-5LPsychometricsReliabilityResponsivenessThailandValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.