Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26048278›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Using CellMiner 1.6 for Systems Pharmacology and Genomic Analysis of the NCI-60.

William C Reinhold, Margot Sunshine, Sudhir Varma, James H Doroshow, Yves Pommier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification and characterization of topoisomerase III beta poisons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William C ReinholdDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. wcr@mail.nih.gov pommier@nih.gov.
Margot SunshineDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. Systems Research and Applications Corp., Fairfax, Virginia.
Sudhir VarmaDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. Systems Research and Applications Corp., Fairfax, Virginia. HiThru Analytics LLC, Laurel, Maryland.
James H DoroshowDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. Developmental Therapeutics Program, DCTD, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Yves PommierDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. wcr@mail.nih.gov pommier@nih.gov.

Funding

Genomics and Systems Pharmacology CoreZICBC011475 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI REINHOLD, WILLIAM · 2013 to 2025
$3.4M
Comparison of molecular factors to drug activities.ZICBC011509 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI REINHOLD, WILLIAM · 2013 to 2025
$1.4M
Development of novel molecular or phenotypic databasesZICBC011622 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI REINHOLD, WILLIAM · 2015 to 2020
$726k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC BC011475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NCI-60 cancer cell line panel provides a premier model for data integration, and systems pharmacology being the largest publicly available database of anticancer drug activity, genomic, molecular, and phenotypic data. It comprises gene expression (25,722 transcripts), microRNAs (360 miRNAs), whole-genome DNA copy number (23,413 genes), whole-exome sequencing (variants for 16,568 genes), protein levels (94 genes), and cytotoxic activity (20,861 compounds). Included are 158 FDA-approved drugs and 79 that are in clinical trials. To improve data accessibility to bioinformaticists and non-bioinformaticists alike, we have developed the CellMiner web-based tools. Here, we describe the newest CellMiner version, including integration of novel databases and tools associated with whole-exome sequencing and protein expression, and review the tools. Included are (i) "Cell line signature" for DNA, RNA, protein, and drugs; (ii) "Cross correlations" for up to 150 input genes, microRNAs, and compounds in a single query; (iii) "Pattern comparison" to identify connections among drugs, gene expression, genomic variants, microRNA, and protein expressions; (iv) "Genetic variation versus drug visualization" to identify potential new drug:gene DNA variant relationships; and (v) "Genetic variant summation" designed to provide a synopsis of mutational burden on any pathway or gene group for up to 150 genes. Together, these tools allow users to flexibly query the NCI-60 data for potential relationships between genomic, molecular, and pharmacologic parameters in a manner specific to the user's area of expertise. Examples for both gain- (RAS) and loss-of-function (PTEN) alterations are provided.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsSoftwareCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDrug DiscoveryExomeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic VariationGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansWeb BrowserAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26048278
PMCPMC4558215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.