Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26048243›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology2015

Repurposing medicinal compounds for blood cancer treatment.

Bronagh McCabe, Fabio Liberante, Ken I Mills

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Repurposing of Anticancer Stem Cell Drugs in Brain Tumors.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The RANK-RANKL axis: an opportunity for drug repurposing in cancer?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bronagh McCabeCentre for Biomedical Sciences Education, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK, bmccabe06@qub.ac.uk.
Fabio Liberante
Ken I Mills

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug development is being continuously scrutinised for its lack of productivity. Novel drug development is associated with high costs, high failure rates and lengthy development process. These downfalls combined with a huge demand in blood cancer for new therapeutic treatments have led many to consider the method of drug repurposing. Finding new therapeutic indications for already established drug substances is known as redirecting, repositioning, reprofiling, or repurposing of drugs. Off-patent and on-patent drugs can be screened for additional targets and new indications thus bringing them to clinical trials at a faster pace. This approach offers smaller research groups, such as those that are academic based, into the drug development industry. Drug repurposing can make use of previously published data concerning dosage, toxicology and mechanism of activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesDrug Delivery SystemsDrug RepositioningHematologic NeoplasmsHumansImatinib MesylatePiperazinesPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesImatinib MesylatePiperazinesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID26048243
PMCPMC4488459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.