Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26048167›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2015

Analgesic use in a Norwegian general population: change over time and high-risk use--The Tromsø Study.

Per-Jostein Samuelsen, Lars Slørdal, Ulla Dorte Mathisen, Anne Elise Eggen

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prescribing Analgesics to Older People: A Challenge for GPs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Burnout and health behaviors in health professionals from seven European countries.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Per-Jostein SamuelsenRegional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Center (RELIS), University Hospital of North Norway, N-9038, Tromsø, Norway. per-jostein.samuelsen@unn.no.
Lars SlørdalDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Ulla Dorte MathisenSection of Nephrology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Anne Elise EggenDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
University Hospital of North Norway · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased use of analgesics in the population is a cause for concern in terms of drug safety. There is a paucity of population-based studies monitoring the change in use over time of both non-prescription (OTC) analgesics and prescription (Rx) analgesics. Although much is known about the risks associated with analgesic use, we are lacking knowledge on high-risk use at a population level. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of non-prescription and prescription analgesic use, change over time and the prevalence in the presence of potential contraindications and drug interactions in a general population.

methodsA repeated cross-sectional study with data from participants (30-89 years) of the Tromsø Study in 2001-02 (Tromsø 5; N = 8039) and in 2007-08 (Tromsø 6; N = 12,981). Participants reported use of OTC and Rx analgesics and regular use of all drugs in the preceding four weeks. Change over the time period was analyzed with generalized estimating equations. The prevalence of regular analgesic use in persons with or without a clinically significant contraindication or drug interaction was determined in the Tromsø 6 population, and differences were tested with logistic regression.

resultsAnalgesic use increased from 54 to 60% in women (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.32) and from 29 to 37% in men (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.27-1.52) in the time period; the increase was due to sporadic use of OTC analgesics. There was substantial regular use of analgesics in several of the contraindication categories examined; the prevalence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was more than eight per cent among persons with chronic kidney disease, gastrointestinal ulcers, or high primary cardiovascular risk. About four per cent of the study population demonstrated at least one potential drug interaction with an analgesic drug.

conclusionsThe use of analgesics increased in the time period due to an increase in the use of OTC analgesics. Analgesic exposure in the presence of contraindications or drug interactions may put patients at risk. Public and prescriber awareness about clinically relevant contraindications and drug interactions with analgesics need to be increased.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsContraindicationsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug InteractionsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwaySex CharacteristicsTime FactorsAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID26048167
PMCPMC4456710
OpenAlexW1700829461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.