ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2015
Analgesic use in a Norwegian general population: change over time and high-risk use--The Tromsø Study.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of over-the-counter analgesics in Norwegian children - a national cross-sectional study.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and risk factors of migraine and TTH in Sudanese health sciences students.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of kidney size on mortality in diabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Prescribing Analgesics to Older People: A Challenge for GPs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of prescription practices and use in primary care.Clinical kidney journal · 2020Article
- Stocks of paracetamol products stored in urban New Zealand households: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Analgesia (mis)usage on a dental emergency service: a patient survey.Clinical oral investigations · 2018Article
- Gender differences in dispensed analgesics in Sweden during 2006-2015 - an observational, nationwide, whole-population study.International journal of women's health · 2018Article
- Erratum to: Analgesic use in a Norwegian general population: change over time and high-risk use - The Tromsø Study.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2017Article
- Pain sensitivity and analgesic use among 10,486 adults: the Tromsø study.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2017Article
- Burnout and health behaviors in health professionals from seven European countries.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2016Article
- Persistent analgesic use and the association with chronic pain and other risk factors in the population-a longitudinal study from the Tromsø Study and the Norwegian Prescription Database.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- An ecological study of the extent and factors associated with the use of prescription and over-the-counter codeine in Australia.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- Management of headache and associated factors among undergraduate medicine and health science students of University of Gondar, North West Ethiopia.The journal of headache and pain · 2016Article
- Analgesic Self-medication Among Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in a South African Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study.Journal of chiropractic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreased use of analgesics in the population is a cause for concern in terms of drug safety. There is a paucity of population-based studies monitoring the change in use over time of both non-prescription (OTC) analgesics and prescription (Rx) analgesics. Although much is known about the risks associated with analgesic use, we are lacking knowledge on high-risk use at a population level. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of non-prescription and prescription analgesic use, change over time and the prevalence in the presence of potential contraindications and drug interactions in a general population.
methodsA repeated cross-sectional study with data from participants (30-89 years) of the Tromsø Study in 2001-02 (Tromsø 5; N = 8039) and in 2007-08 (Tromsø 6; N = 12,981). Participants reported use of OTC and Rx analgesics and regular use of all drugs in the preceding four weeks. Change over the time period was analyzed with generalized estimating equations. The prevalence of regular analgesic use in persons with or without a clinically significant contraindication or drug interaction was determined in the Tromsø 6 population, and differences were tested with logistic regression.
resultsAnalgesic use increased from 54 to 60% in women (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.32) and from 29 to 37% in men (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.27-1.52) in the time period; the increase was due to sporadic use of OTC analgesics. There was substantial regular use of analgesics in several of the contraindication categories examined; the prevalence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was more than eight per cent among persons with chronic kidney disease, gastrointestinal ulcers, or high primary cardiovascular risk. About four per cent of the study population demonstrated at least one potential drug interaction with an analgesic drug.
conclusionsThe use of analgesics increased in the time period due to an increase in the use of OTC analgesics. Analgesic exposure in the presence of contraindications or drug interactions may put patients at risk. Public and prescriber awareness about clinically relevant contraindications and drug interactions with analgesics need to be increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.