ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015
Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic heterogeneity: Challenges, impacts, and methods through an associative lens.Genetic epidemiology · 2022Review
- Understanding Breast Cancers through Spatial and High-Resolution Visualization Using Imaging Technologies.Cancers · 2022Review
- Widespread redundancy in -omics profiles of cancer mutation states.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Epigenetic interplay between methylation and miRNA in bladder cancer: focus on isoform expression.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Integration of Proteomics and Other Omics Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Improving prediction performance of colon cancer prognosis based on the integration of clinical and multi-omics data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Preparing next-generation scientists for biomedical big data: artificial intelligence approaches.Personalized medicine · 2019Review
- Network approaches to systems biology analysis of complex disease: integrative methods for multi-omics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Review
- Data integration by multi-tuning parameter elastic net regression.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Integrative pathway-based survival prediction utilizing the interaction between gene expression and DNA methylation in breast cancer.BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
- Integrative analysis reveals disrupted pathways regulated by microRNAs in cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Imitating Pathologist Based Assessment With Interpretable and Context Based Neural Network Modeling of Histology Images.Biomedical informatics insights · 2018Article
- Identification of epigenetic interactions between miRNA and DNA methylation associated with gene expression as potential prognostic markers in bladder cancer.BMC medical genomics · 2017Article
- Identifying subtype-specific associations between gene expression and DNA methylation profiles in breast cancer.BMC medical genomics · 2017Article
- Using knowledge-driven genomic interactions for multi-omics data analysis: metadimensional models for predicting clinical outcomes in ovarian carcinoma.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluation of survival models to predict cancer patient prognosis is one of the most important areas of emphasis in cancer research. A binary classification approach has difficulty directly predicting survival due to the characteristics of censored observations and the fact that the predictive power depends on the threshold used to set two classes. In contrast, the traditional Cox regression approach has some drawbacks in the sense that it does not allow for the identification of interactions between genomic features, which could have key roles associated with cancer prognosis. In addition, data integration is regarded as one of the important issues in improving the predictive power of survival models since cancer could be caused by multiple alterations through meta-dimensional genomic data including genome, epigenome, transcriptome, and proteome. Here we have proposed a new integrative framework designed to perform these three functions simultaneously: (1) predicting censored survival data; (2) integrating meta-dimensional omics data; (3) identifying interactions within/between meta-dimensional genomic features associated with survival. In order to predict censored survival time, martingale residuals were calculated as a new continuous outcome and a new fitness function used by the grammatical evolution neural network (GENN) based on mean absolute difference of martingale residuals was implemented. To test the utility of the proposed framework, a simulation study was conducted, followed by an analysis of meta-dimensional omics data including copy number, gene expression, DNA methylation, and protein expression data in breast cancer retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). On the basis of the results from breast cancer dataset, we were able to identify interactions not only within a single dimension of genomic data but also between meta-dimensional omics data that are associated with survival. Notably, the predictive power of our best meta-dimensional model was 73% which outperformed all of the other models conducted based on a single dimension of genomic data. Breast cancer is an extremely heterogeneous disease and the high levels of genomic diversity within/between breast tumors could affect the risk of therapeutic responses and disease progression. Thus, identifying interactions within/between meta-dimensional omics data associated with survival in breast cancer is expected to deliver direction for improved meta-dimensional prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.