Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26047934›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): a clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial.

Isabel Rubie, Catherine Haighton, James O'Hara, Nikki Rousseau, Nick Steen, Deborah D Stocken, Frank Sullivan, Luke Vale, Scott Wilkes, Janet Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. The effect of tonsillectomy on the morbidity from recurrent tonsillitis.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2017
    Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel RubieInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. isabel.rubie@newcastle.ac.uk.
Catherine HaightonInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. Katie.haighton@ncl.ac.uk.
James O'HaraENT Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK. James.Ohara@nuth.nhs.uk.
Nikki RousseauInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. nikki.rousseau@newcastle.ac.uk.
Nick SteenInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. nick.steen@newcastle.ac.uk.
Deborah D StockenInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. deborah.stocken@newcastle.ac.uk.
Frank SullivanDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada. Frank.Sullivan@nygh.on.ca.
Luke ValeInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. Luke.Vale@newcastle.ac.uk.
Scott WilkesDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, SR1 3SD, UK. Scott.Wilkes@sunderland.ac.uk.
Janet WilsonInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. janet.wilson@newcastle.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBFreeman Hospital · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sunderland · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Department of Health 12/146/06Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of tonsillectomy in the management of adult tonsillitis remains uncertain and UK regional variation in tonsillectomy rates persists. Patients, doctors and health policy makers wish to know the costs and benefits of tonsillectomy against conservative management and whether therapy can be better targeted to maximise benefits and minimise risks of surgery, hence maximising cost-effective use of resources. NATTINA incorporates the first attempt to map current NHS referral criteria against other metrics of tonsil disease severity. METHODS/

designA UK multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial for adults with recurrent tonsillitis to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of tonsillectomy versus conservative management. An initial feasibility study comprises qualitative interviews to investigate the practicality of the protocol, including willingness to randomise and be randomised. Approximately 20 otolaryngology staff, 10 GPs and 15 ENT patients will be recruited over 5 months in all 9 proposed main trial participating sites. A 6-month internal pilot will then recruit 72 patients across 6 of the 9 sites. Participants will be adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis referred by a GP to secondary care. Randomisation between tonsillectomy and conservative management will be according to a blocked allocation method in a 1:1 ratio stratified by centre and baseline disease severity. If the pilot is successful, the main trial will recruit a further 528 patients over 18 months in all 9 participating sites. All participants will be followed up for a total of 24 months, throughout which both primary and secondary outcome data will be collected. The primary outcome is the number of sore throat days experienced over the 24-month follow-up. The pilot and main trials include an embedded qualitative process evaluation. DISCUSSION: NATTINA is designed to evaluate the relative effectiveness and efficiency of tonsillectomy versus conservative management in patients with recurrent sore throat who are eligible for surgery. Most adult tonsil disease and surgery has an impact on economically active age groups, with individual and societal costs through loss of earnings and productivity. Avoidance of unnecessary operations and prioritisation of those individuals likely to gain most from tonsillectomy would reduce costs to the NHS and society.

trial registrationISRCTN55284102, Date of Registration: 4 August 2014.

Indexed as

Hospital CostsAdultClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsRecurrenceResearch DesignTime FactorsTonsillectomyTonsillitisTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26047934
PMCPMC4467045
OpenAlexW1661438612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.