Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26047811›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Implementing administrative evidence based practices: lessons from the field in six local health departments across the United States.

Kathleen Duggan, Kristelle Aisaka, Rachel G Tabak, Carson Smith, Paul Erwin, Ross C Brownson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathleen DugganPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. kduggan@brownschool.wustl.edu.
Kristelle AisakaPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. kraisaka@gmail.com.
Rachel G TabakPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. rtabak@brownschool.wustl.edu.
Carson SmithPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. cesmith86@gmail.com.
Paul ErwinDepartment of Public Health, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. perwin@utk.edu.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. rbrownson@wustl.edu.

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Worksite Policies and neighborhood Influences on Obesity and Cancer RiskU54CA155496 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2011 to 2016
$9.0M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155496NIDDK NIH HHS 1P30DK092950NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdministrative evidence based practices (A-EBPs) are agency level structures and activities positively associated with performance measures (e.g., achieving core public health functions, carrying out evidence-based interventions). The objectives of this study were to examine the contextual conditions and explore differences in local health department (LHD) characteristics that influence the implementation of A-EBPs.

methodsQualitative case studies were conducted based on data from 35 practitioners in six LHDs across the United States. The sample was chosen using an A-EBP score from our 2012 national survey and was linked to secondary data from the National Public Health Performance Standards Program. Three LHDs that scored high and three LHDs that scored low on both measures were selected as case study sites. The 37-question interview guide explored LHD use of an evidence based decision making process, including A-EBPs and evidence-based programs and policies. Each interview took 30-60 min. Standard qualitative methodology was used for data coding and analysis using NVivo software.

resultsAs might be expected, high-capacity LHDs were more likely to have strong leadership, partnerships, financial flexibility, workforce development activities, and an organizational culture supportive of evidence based decision making and implementation of A-EBPs. They were also more likely to describe having strong or important relationships with universities and other educational resources, increasing their access to resources and allowing them to more easily share knowledge and expertise.

conclusionsDifferences between high- and low-capacity LHDs in A-EBP domains highlight the importance of investments in these areas and the potential those investments have to contribute to overall efficiency and performance. Further research may identify avenues to enhance resources in these domains to create an organizational culture supportive of A-EBPs.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeLocal GovernmentProgram DevelopmentPublic Health AdministrationDecision MakingEvaluation Studies as TopicHealth ResourcesHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipOrganizational CultureUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26047811
PMCPMC4457307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.