Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26047662›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurovirology2016

The brain's Geppetto-microbes as puppeteers of neural function and behaviour?

Roman M Stilling, Timothy G Dinan, John F Cryan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurovirology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Old Friends, immunoregulation, and stress resilience.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Why does the microbiome affect behaviour?Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A psychology of the human brain-gut-microbiome axis.Social and personality psychology compass · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mind-altering microbes.Journal of neurovirology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roman M StillingAlimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. rstilling@ucc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7637-5851
Timothy G DinanAlimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
John F CryanAlimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. j.cryan@ucc.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on the microbiome and its interaction with various host organs, including the brain, is increasingly gaining momentum. With more evidence establishing a comprehensive microbiota-gut-brain axis, questions have been raised as to the extent to which microbes influence brain physiology and behaviour. In parallel, there is a growing literature showing active behavioural manipulation in favour of the microbe for certain parasites. However, it seems unclear where the hidden majority of microbes are localised on the parasitism-mutualism spectrum. A long evolutionary history intimately connects host and microbiota, which complicates this classification. In this conceptual minireview, we discuss current hypotheses on host-microbe interaction and argue that novel experimental approaches and theoretical concepts, such as the hologenome theory, are necessary to incorporate transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of the microbiome into evolutionary theories.

Indexed as

BehaviorHost-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiological EvolutionBrainDietFeeding BehaviorGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHumansSymbiosisCo-evolutionCommensalEpigeneticsHost behaviourHost ecologyMetagenomeNeurovirusParasite

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.