Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26047637›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Text mining facilitates database curation - extraction of mutation-disease associations from Bio-medical literature.

Komandur Elayavilli Ravikumar, Kavishwar B Wagholikar, Dingcheng Li, Jean-Pierre Kocher, Hongfang Liu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. PJAMIA open · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. nala: text mining natural language mutation mentions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mining clinical attributes of genomic variants through assisted literature curation in Egas.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Komandur Elayavilli RavikumarDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Harvick 3rd, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. KomandurElayavilli.Ravikumar@mayo.edu.
Kavishwar B WagholikarDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Harvick 3rd, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Wagholikar.Kavishwar@mayo.edu.
Dingcheng LiDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Harvick 3rd, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Li.DingCheng@mayo.edu.
Jean-Pierre KocherDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Harvick 3rd, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Kocher.Jeanpierre@mayo.edu.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Harvick 3rd, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Liu.Hongfang@mayo.edu.

Funding

Onto-BioThesaurus: ontological representation of gene/protein names for biomedicaR01LM009959 · NLM · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG · 2009 to 2010
$1.2M
A Framework to Enhance Decision Support by Invoking NLP: Methods and ApplicationsK99LM011575 · NLM · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WAGHOLIKAR, KAVISHWAR B. · 2014 to 2015
$179k
NLM NIH HHS 1K99LM011575NLM NIH HHS K99 LM011575NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009959NLM NIH HHS R01LM009959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in the next generation sequencing technology has accelerated the pace of individualized medicine (IM), which aims to incorporate genetic/genomic information into medicine. One immediate need in interpreting sequencing data is the assembly of information about genetic variants and their corresponding associations with other entities (e.g., diseases or medications). Even with dedicated effort to capture such information in biological databases, much of this information remains 'locked' in the unstructured text of biomedical publications. There is a substantial lag between the publication and the subsequent abstraction of such information into databases. Multiple text mining systems have been developed, but most of them focus on the sentence level association extraction with performance evaluation based on gold standard text annotations specifically prepared for text mining systems.

resultsWe developed and evaluated a text mining system, MutD, which extracts protein mutation-disease associations from MEDLINE abstracts by incorporating discourse level analysis, using a benchmark data set extracted from curated database records. MutD achieves an F-measure of 64.3% for reconstructing protein mutation disease associations in curated database records. Discourse level analysis component of MutD contributed to a gain of more than 10% in F-measure when compared against the sentence level association extraction. Our error analysis indicates that 23 of the 64 precision errors are true associations that were not captured by database curators and 68 of the 113 recall errors are caused by the absence of associated disease entities in the abstract. After adjusting for the defects in the curated database, the revised F-measure of MutD in association detection reaches 81.5%.

conclusionsOur quantitative analysis reveals that MutD can effectively extract protein mutation disease associations when benchmarking based on curated database records. The analysis also demonstrates that incorporating discourse level analysis significantly improved the performance of extracting the protein-mutation-disease association. Future work includes the extension of MutD for full text articles.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMedical Subject HeadingsPublicationsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualData MiningDiseaseGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID26047637
PMCPMC4457984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.