Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26046847›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Identification of Novel Cetacean Poxviruses in Cetaceans Stranded in South West England.

James Barnett, Akbar Dastjerdi, Nick Davison, Rob Deaville, David Everest, Julie Peake, Christopher Finnegan, Paul Jepson, Falko Steinbach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Seroepidemiological survey of sealpox virus infection in marine mammals.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cetacean Poxvirus in Two Striped Dolphins (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James BarnettAnimal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Polwhele, Truro, United Kingdom; Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter Cornwall Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.
Akbar DastjerdiVirology Department, Science Division, APHA, Weybridge, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Nick DavisonAnimal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), Polwhele, Truro, United Kingdom; Scottish Marine Animal Stranding Scheme, SRUC Veterinary Services, Inverness, United Kingdom.
Rob DeavilleUK Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme, Institute of Zoology, London, United Kingdom.
David EverestPathology Department, Science Division, APHA, Weybridge, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Julie PeakeVirology Department, Science Division, APHA, Weybridge, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Christopher FinneganVirology Department, Science Division, APHA, Weybridge, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Paul JepsonUK Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme, Institute of Zoology, London, United Kingdom.
Falko SteinbachVirology Department, Science Division, APHA, Weybridge, Addlestone, United Kingdom; School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBZoological Society of London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poxvirus infections in marine mammals have been mainly reported through their clinical lesions and electron microscopy (EM). Poxvirus particles in association with such lesions have been demonstrated by EM and were previously classified as two new viruses, cetacean poxvirus 1 (CePV-1) and cetacean poxvirus 2 (CePV-2). In this study, epidermal pox lesions in cetaceans stranded in South West England (Cornwall) between 2008 and 2012 were investigated by electron microscopy and molecular analysis. PCR and sequencing of a highly conserved region within the viral DNA polymerase gene ruled out both parapox- and orthopoxviruses. Moreover, phylogenetic analysis of the PCR product clustered the sequences with those previously described as cetacean poxviruses. However, taking the close genetic distance of this gene fragment across the family of poxviridae into account, it is reasonable to postulate further, novel cetacean poxvirus species. The nucleotide similarity within each cluster (tentative species) detected ranged from 98.6% to 100%, whilst the similarity between the clusters was no more than 95%. The detection of several species of poxvirus in different cetacean species confirms the likelihood of a heterogeneous cetacean poxvirus genus, comparable to the heterogeneity observed in other poxvirus genera.

Indexed as

AnimalsCetaceaDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA, ViralEnglandMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPoxviridaePoxviridae InfectionsSequence Analysis, DNAViral ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA, ViralViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26046847
PMCPMC4457422
OpenAlexW613405609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.