Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26046791›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Identifying ultrasound and clinical features of breast cancer molecular subtypes by ensemble decision.

Lei Zhang, Jing Li, Yun Xiao, Hao Cui, Guoqing Du, Ying Wang, Ziyao Li, Tong Wu, Xia Li, Jiawei Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lei ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Ultrasonic medicine, The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yun XiaoCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Hao CuiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Guoqing DuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Ying WangDepartment of general surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical Universtiy, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Ziyao LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Tong WuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xia LiCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jiawei TianDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is molecularly heterogeneous and categorized into four molecular subtypes: Luminal-A, Luminal-B, HER2-amplified and Triple-negative. In this study, we aimed to apply an ensemble decision approach to identify the ultrasound and clinical features related to the molecular subtypes. We collected ultrasound and clinical features from 1,000 breast cancer patients and performed immunohistochemistry on these samples. We used the ensemble decision approach to select unique features and to construct decision models. The decision model for Luminal-A subtype was constructed based on the presence of an echogenic halo and post-acoustic shadowing or indifference. The decision model for Luminal-B subtype was constructed based on the absence of an echogenic halo and vascularity. The decision model for HER2-amplified subtype was constructed based on the presence of post-acoustic enhancement, calcification, vascularity and advanced age. The model for Triple-negative subtype followed two rules. One was based on irregular shape, lobulate margin contour, the absence of calcification and hypovascularity, whereas the other was based on oval shape, hypovascularity and micro-lobulate margin contour. The accuracies of the models were 83.8%, 77.4%, 87.9% and 92.7%, respectively. We identified specific features of each molecular subtype and expanded the scope of ultrasound for making diagnoses using these decision models.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsChildErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneUltrasonographyErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID26046791
PMCPMC4457139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.