Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26046661›Full record

ArticleProteomics2015

Enhancing bottom-up and top-down proteomic measurements with ion mobility separations.

Erin Shammel Baker, Kristin E Burnum-Johnson, Yehia M Ibrahim, Daniel J Orton, Matthew E Monroe, Ryan T Kelly, Ronald J Moore, Xing Zhang, Roger Théberge, Catherine E Costello and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Top-down proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Review
  12. Single-cell Proteomics: Progress and Prospects.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Erin Shammel BakerBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Kristin E Burnum-JohnsonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Yehia M IbrahimBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Daniel J OrtonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Matthew E MonroeBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Ryan T KellyEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Ronald J MooreBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Xing ZhangBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Roger ThébergeCenter for Biomedical Mass Spectrometry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Catherine E CostelloCenter for Biomedical Mass Spectrometry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard D SmithBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.

Funding

Equipment Supplement Request for a Research Resource for Ultra-sensitive High Throughput ProteomicsP41GM103493 · NIGMS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2012 to 2022
$22.6M
Mass Spectrometry Resource for Biology and MedicineP41GM104603 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI COSTELLO, CATHERINE E. · 2012 to 2017
$10.4M
Platform Providing Increased Throughput, Sensitivity and Specificity for MetaboloR01ES022190 · NIEHS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI BAKER, ERIN S · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES022190NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES022190NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103493NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM104603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic measurements with greater throughput, sensitivity, and structural information are essential for improving both in-depth characterization of complex mixtures and targeted studies. While LC separation coupled with MS (LC-MS) measurements have provided information on thousands of proteins in different sample types, the introduction of a separation stage that provides further component resolution and rapid structural information has many benefits in proteomic analyses. Technical advances in ion transmission and data acquisition have made ion mobility separations an opportune technology to be easily and effectively incorporated into LC-MS proteomic measurements for enhancing their information content. Herein, we report on applications illustrating increased sensitivity, throughput, and structural information by utilizing IMS-MS and LC-IMS-MS measurements for both bottom-up and top-down proteomics measurements.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidComplex MixturesMass SpectrometryPeptidesProteinsProteomicsComplex MixturesPeptidesProteinsIon mobility separationsIon mobility spectrometryMass spectrometryProteomics

Identifiers

PMID26046661
PMCPMC4534090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.