Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26046634›Full record

ReviewSpatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology2015

Sources of spatial animal and human health data: Casting the net wide to deal more effectively with increasingly complex disease problems.

Kim B Stevens, Dirk U Pfeiffer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of the built environment on health behaviours and disease transmission in social systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kim B StevensVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Dept. of Production & Population Health, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kstevens@rvc.ac.uk.
Dirk U PfeifferVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Dept. of Production & Population Health, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: pfeiffer@rvc.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last 30years it has become commonplace for epidemiological studies to collect locational attributes of disease data. Although this advancement was driven largely by the introduction of handheld global positioning systems (GPS), and more recently, smartphones and tablets with built-in GPS, the collection of georeferenced disease data has moved beyond the use of handheld GPS devices and there now exist numerous sources of crowdsourced georeferenced disease data such as that available from georeferencing of Google search queries or Twitter messages. In addition, cartography has moved beyond the realm of professionals to crowdsourced mapping projects that play a crucial role in disease control and surveillance of outbreaks such as the 2014 West Africa Ebola epidemic. This paper provides a comprehensive review of a range of innovative sources of spatial animal and human health data including data warehouses, mHealth, Google Earth, volunteered geographic information and mining of internet-based big data sources such as Google and Twitter. We discuss the advantages, limitations and applications of each, and highlight studies where they have been used effectively.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic MethodsGeographic MappingWeb BrowserAfrica, WesternAnimalsDatabases, FactualData MiningDisease OutbreaksGeographic Information SystemsHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPopulation SurveillanceTelemedicineBig dataData warehouseGoogle EarthmHealthSpatial dataVolunteered geographic information

Identifiers

PMID26046634
PMCPMC7102771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.