ArticlePloS one2015
Comparing Analysis Methods in Functional Calcium Imaging of the Insect Brain.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensory responses of olfactory and vomeronasal neurons in does are influenced by buck odors and their reproductive status.Chemical senses · 2025Article
- Human tripartite cortical network model for temporal assessment of alpha-synuclein aggregation and propagation in Parkinson's Disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Sexual discrimination and attraction through scents in the water vole, Arvicola terrestris.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024Article
- Novel algorithms for improved detection and analysis of fluorescent signal fluctuations.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023Article
- Calcium signaling in individual APP/PS1 mouse dentate gyrus astrocytes increases ex vivo with Aβ pathology and age without affecting astrocyte network activity.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022Article
- Comparative Effects of Event Detection Methods on the Analysis and Interpretation of CaFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Calcium imaging analysis - how far have we come?F1000Research · 2021Review
- Imaging and analysis of genetically encoded calcium indicators linking neural circuits and behaviors.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2019Review
- Article
- Serotonergic modulation of the activity of GLP-1 producing neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract in mouse.Molecular metabolism · 2017Article
- Multimodal interaction in the insect brain.BMC neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate four different methods for background estimation in calcium imaging of the insect brain and evaluate their performance on six data sets consisting of data recorded from two sites in two species of moths. The calcium fluorescence decay curve outside the potential response is estimated using either a low-pass filter or constant, linear or polynomial regression, and is subsequently used to calculate the magnitude, latency and duration of the response. The magnitude and variance of the responses that are obtained by the different methods are compared, and, by computing the receiver operating characteristics of a classifier based on response magnitude, we evaluate the ability of each method to detect the stimulus type and conclude that a polynomial approximation of the background gives the overall best result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.