Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26046530›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative Transcriptome and iTRAQ Proteome Analyses of Citrus Root Responses to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Infection.

Yun Zhong, Chun-Zhen Cheng, Nong-Hui Jiang, Bo Jiang, Yong-Yan Zhang, Bo Wu, Min-Lun Hu, Ji-Wu Zeng, Hua-Xue Yan, Gan-Jun Yi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptomic analysis of early stages of 'Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. FlgI Is a Sec-Dependent Effector ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Upregulated Expression of the CitrusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. "Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. FeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yun ZhongInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Chun-Zhen ChengInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Nong-Hui JiangInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Bo JiangInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Yong-Yan ZhangInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Bo WuInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Min-Lun HuInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Ji-Wu ZengInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Hua-Xue YanInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Gan-Jun YiKey Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Guang-Yan ZhongInstitute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Tree Researches, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510640, P.R.China.
Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root samples of 'Sanhu' red tangerine trees infected with and without Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) were collected at 50 days post inoculation and subjected to RNA-sequencing and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) to profile the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and proteins (DEPs), respectively. Quantitative real-time PCR was subsequently used to confirm the expression of 16 selected DEGs. Results showed that a total of 3956 genes and 78 proteins were differentially regulated by HLB-infection. Among the most highly up-regulated DEPs were sperm specific protein 411, copper ion binding protein, germin-like proteins, subtilisin-like proteins and serine carboxypeptidase-like 40 proteins whose transcript levels were concomitantly up-regulated as shown by RNA-seq data. Comparison between our results and those of the previously reported showed that known HLB-modulated biological pathways including cell-wall modification, protease-involved protein degradation, carbohydrate metabolism, hormone synthesis and signaling, transcription activities, and stress responses were similarly regulated by HLB infection but different or root-specific changes did exist. The root unique changes included the down-regulation in genes of ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation pathway, secondary metabolism, cytochrome P450s, UDP-glucosyl transferases and pentatricopeptide repeat containing proteins. Notably, nutrient absorption was impaired by HLB-infection as the expression of the genes involved in Fe, Zn, N and P adsorption and transportation were significantly changed. HLB-infection induced some cellular defense responses but simultaneously reduced the biosynthesis of the three major classes of secondary metabolites, many of which are known to have anti-pathogen activities. Genes involved in callose deposition were up-regulated whereas those involved in callose degradation were also up-regulated, indicating that the sieve tube elements in roots were hanging on the balance of life and death at this stage. In addition, signs of carbohydrate starvation were already eminent in roots at this stage. Other interesting genes and pathways that were changed by HLB-infection were also discussed based on our findings.

Indexed as

ProteomicsTranscriptomeCarbohydrate MetabolismChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCitrusDown-RegulationHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlant DiseasesPlant RootsProteomeReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRhizobiaceaeSequence Analysis, RNASpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationUp-RegulationProteome

Identifiers

PMID26046530
PMCPMC4457719
OpenAlexW1558436339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.