SynthesisThe Journal of investigative dermatology2015
Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Long-Term Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Association between Genetics and Response to Treatment with Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of Biologics and Oral Treatments for Plaque Psoriasis: A Meta-analysis.JAMA dermatology · 2020Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Long-term efficacy of novel therapies in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of PASI response.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2019Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Quantitative Evaluation of Biologic Therapy Options for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2017Pooled it
- Risk of Serious Infections in Patients with Psoriasis on Biologic Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2016Pooled it
- Indirect Regulation and Equilibrium of p35 and p40 Subunits of Interleukin (IL)-12/23 by Ustekinumab in Psoriasis Treatment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Trial
- Dermatological guidelines for monitoring methotrexate treatment reduce drug-survival compared to rheumatological guidelines.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Health utility by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index response status after biologic induction therapy in Chinese patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Acupoint Injection Combined with BCG-PSN and Thymosin Enteric-Coated Tablets Improve China Han Psoriasis Vulgaris by Regulating T Cell Subsets.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Factors Affecting Treatment Persistence in Japanese Patients with Psoriasis Prescribed Biologics: A Real-World Study Using an Insurance Claim Database.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Paradoxical Psoriasis Induced by Ustekinumab: A Comprehensive Review and Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Identification of novel immune subtypes and potential hub genes of patients with psoriasis.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Allelic Variants of HLA-C Upstream Region,Vaccines · 2022Article
- Orchestrated Cytokines Mediated by Biologics in Psoriasis and Its Mechanisms of Action.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Choice of Systemic Drugs for the Management of Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: A Cross-country Comparison Based on National Health Insurance Data.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psoriasis as a chronic inflammatory disease often requires effective long-term treatment; a comprehensive systematic evaluation of efficacy and safety of systemic long-term treatments in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis is lacking. Twenty-five randomized clinical trials were included. Results were pooled and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). With respect to PASI 75 (psoriasis area and severity index), pooled risk ratios for infliximab (13.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.60-19.87), secukinumab (11.97, 95% CI: 8.83-16.23), ustekinumab (11.39, 95% CI: 8.94-14.51), adalimumab (8.92, 95% CI: 6.33-12.57), etanercept (8.39, 95% CI: 6.74-10.45), and apremilast (5.83, 95% CI: 2.58-13.17) show superiority of biologics and apremilast in long-term therapy compared with placebo. With respect to the addressed safety parameters, no differences were seen between adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab versus placebo. No placebo-controlled data on conventional treatments was identified. Head-to-head studies showed superior efficacy of secukinumab and infliximab versus etanercept and of infliximab versus methotrexate. A clear ranking is limited by the lack of long-term head-to-head trials. From the available evidence, infliximab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab are the most efficacious long-term treatments. Data on conventionals are insufficient. Further head-to-head comparisons and studies on safety and patient-related outcomes are needed to draw more reliable conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.