Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26046356›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Vitamin D Binding Protein Isoforms and Apolipoprotein E in Cerebrospinal Fluid as Prognostic Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis.

Simona Perga, Alessandra Giuliano Albo, Katarzyna Lis, Nicoletta Minari, Sara Falvo, Fabiana Marnetto, Marzia Caldano, Raffaella Reviglione, Paola Berchialla, Marco A Capobianco and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Bipolar disorder vulnerability: The vitamin D path].Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cerebrospinal fluid vitamin D-binding protein as a new biomarker for the diagnosis of meningitis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Vitamin D and Neurological Diseases: An Endocrine View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simona PergaNeurology Unit 2 & Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre (CReSM), San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), c/o San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Alessandra Giuliano AlboABLE Biosciences, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy; LIMA, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy.
Katarzyna LisLIMA, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy.
Nicoletta MinariLIMA, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy.
Sara FalvoABLE Biosciences, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy; LIMA, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy.
Fabiana MarnettoNeurology Unit 2 & Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre (CReSM), San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), c/o San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Marzia CaldanoNeurology Unit 2 & Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre (CReSM), San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), c/o San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Raffaella ReviglioneABLE Biosciences, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy; LIMA, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy.
Paola BerchiallaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco A CapobiancoNeurology Unit 2 & Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre (CReSM), San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Maria MalentacchiNeurology Unit 2 & Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre (CReSM), San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Davide CorpilloABLE Biosciences, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy; LIMA, Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy.
Antonio BertolottoNeurology Unit 2 & Regional Referral Multiple Sclerosis Centre (CReSM), San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), c/o San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Neuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a multifactorial autoimmune disease of the central nervous system with a heterogeneous and unpredictable course. To date there are no prognostic biomarkers even if they would be extremely useful for early patient intervention with personalized therapies. In this context, the analysis of inter-individual differences in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteome may lead to the discovery of biological markers that are able to distinguish the various clinical forms at diagnosis.

methodsTo this aim, a two dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) study was carried out on individual CSF samples from 24 untreated women who underwent lumbar puncture (LP) for suspected MS. The patients were clinically monitored for 5 years and then classified according to the degree of disease aggressiveness and the disease-modifying therapies prescribed during follow up.

resultsThe hierarchical cluster analysis of 2-DE dataset revealed three protein spots which were identified by means of mass spectrometry as Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) and two isoforms of vitamin D binding protein (DBP). These three protein spots enabled us to subdivide the patients into subgroups correlated with clinical classification (MS aggressive forms identification: 80%). In particular, we observed an opposite trend of values for the two protein spots corresponding to different DBP isoforms suggesting a role of a post-translational modification rather than the total protein content in patient categorization.

conclusionsThese findings proved to be very interesting and innovative and may be developed as new candidate prognostic biomarkers of MS aggressiveness, if confirmed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultApolipoproteins EBiomarkersBlotting, WesternCluster AnalysisElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalFemaleHumansMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisPrognosisProtein IsoformsProteomeProteomicsApolipoproteins EBiomarkersProtein IsoformsProteomeVitamin D-Binding Protein

Identifiers

PMID26046356
PMCPMC4457896
OpenAlexW1161790691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.