Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26046311›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2015

QSAR Modeling Using Large-Scale Databases: Case Study for HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors.

Olga A Tarasova, Aleksandra F Urusova, Dmitry A Filimonov, Marc C Nicklaus, Alexey V Zakharov, Vladimir V Poroikov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. QSAR without borders.Chemical Society reviews · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olga A Tarasova†Institute of Biochemical Chemistry, 10-8, Pogodinskaya St., 119121, Moscow, Russia.
Aleksandra F Urusova†Institute of Biochemical Chemistry, 10-8, Pogodinskaya St., 119121, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry A Filimonov†Institute of Biochemical Chemistry, 10-8, Pogodinskaya St., 119121, Moscow, Russia.
Marc C Nicklaus‡CADD Group, Chemical Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, NCI-Frederick, 376 Boyles St., Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.
Alexey V Zakharov‡CADD Group, Chemical Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, NCI-Frederick, 376 Boyles St., Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.
Vladimir V Poroikov†Institute of Biochemical Chemistry, 10-8, Pogodinskaya St., 119121, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Large Databases of Small Molecules - Drug Development Tool and Public ResourceZICBC010517 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NICKLAUS, MARC · 2009 to 2025
$3.7M
Tools for Prediction of Drug Metabolism and MetabolitesZIABC011336 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NICKLAUS, MARC · 2010 to 2020
$1.2M
HIV Integrase Modeling and Computer-Aided Inhibitor DevelopmentZ01BC010524 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NICKLAUS, MARC · 2003 to 2008
$363k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale databases are important sources of training sets for various QSAR modeling approaches. Generally, these databases contain information extracted from different sources. This variety of sources can produce inconsistency in the data, defined as sometimes widely diverging activity results for the same compound against the same target. Because such inconsistency can reduce the accuracy of predictive models built from these data, we are addressing the question of how best to use data from publicly and commercially accessible databases to create accurate and predictive QSAR models. We investigate the suitability of commercially and publicly available databases to QSAR modeling of antiviral activity (HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibition). We present several methods for the creation of modeling (i.e., training and test) sets from two, either commercially or freely available, databases: Thomson Reuters Integrity and ChEMBL. We found that the typical predictivities of QSAR models obtained using these different modeling set compilation methods differ significantly from each other. The best results were obtained using training sets compiled for compounds tested using only one method and material (i.e., a specific type of biological assay). Compound sets aggregated by target only typically yielded poorly predictive models. We discuss the possibility of "mix-and-matching" assay data across aggregating databases such as ChEMBL and Integrity and their current severe limitations for this purpose. One of them is the general lack of complete and semantic/computer-parsable descriptions of assay methodology carried by these databases that would allow one to determine mix-and-matchability of result sets at the assay level.

Indexed as

Databases, PharmaceuticalModels, StatisticalQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAlgorithmsDrug DiscoveryDrug Resistance, ViralHIV-1HIV Reverse TranscriptaseReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsHIV Reverse Transcriptasereverse transcriptase, Human immunodeficiency virus 1Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26046311
PMCPMC7738000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.