Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26046137›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2015

The nuclear pore complex--structure and function at a glance.

Greg Kabachinski, Thomas U Schwartz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Personalizing DNA Cancer Vaccines.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Cpeb4-mediated Dclk2 promotes neuronal pyroptosis induced by chronic cerebral ischemia through phosphorylation of Ehf.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A comprehensive comparison of DNA and RNA vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Greg Kabachinski
Thomas U Schwartz
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

High Resolution Assembly Structure of The Nuclear Pore ComplexR01GM077537 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SCHWARTZ, THOMAS · 2007 to 2019
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM077537NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are indispensable for cell function and are at the center of several human diseases. NPCs provide access to the nucleus and regulate the transport of proteins and RNA across the nuclear envelope. They are aqueous channels generated from a complex network of evolutionarily conserved proteins known as nucleporins. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the accompanying poster, we discuss how transport between the nucleoplasm and the cytoplasm is regulated, what we currently know about the structure of individual nucleoporins and the assembled NPC, and how the cell regulates assembly and disassembly of such a massive structure. Our aim is to provide a general overview on what we currently know about the nuclear pore and point out directions of research this area is heading to.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusCell Line, TumorCytoplasmHeLa CellsHumansNuclear PoreNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsRNANuclear Pore Complex ProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID26046137
PMCPMC4311126
OpenAlexW2138057083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.