ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015
POSSUM: A Scoring System for Perforative Peritonitis.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the Emergency Surgery Acuity Score in Patients Who Underwent Emergency General Surgery in South Korea: A Multi-Centre, Retrospective, Post Hoc Analysis.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Risk Stratification Tools and Scoring Systems in Perforated Viscus: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Efficacy of POSSUM and P-POSSUM Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes of Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgeries.Oman medical journal · 2025Article
- Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review.Surgery in practice and science · 2024Review
- Article
- Perioperative clinical parameters associated with short-term mortality after colorectal perforation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Article
- Application of POSSUM and P-POSSUM in Surgical Risk Assessment of Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020Article
- Emergency surgery in older patients.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2019Article
- Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) Study: a WSES observational study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPerforative peritonitis carries considerable morbidity and mortality with the postoperative period unpredictable most of the times. It therefore becomes necessary for a scoring system that predicts the post-operative outcome. POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity) helps in predicting the post-operative morbidity and mortality in these patients. POSSUM scores are based on 12 physiological factors and 6 operative factors. In our study, we included two more factors, which are specifically important in perforative peritonitis; they are, perforation to operation time and the presence of co-morbidity. The presence of these factors significantly affects the post-operative status. Through this prospective study, we can predict which patients are at a higher risk of death or complication and give appropriate management as necessary. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur sample size was 50 patients with perforative peritonitis. The study was conducted in single unit from September 2013 to August 2014. Data was collected based on POSSUM scoring system. Outcome of the patients was recorded as death / alive; complicated / uncomplicated and statistical analysis was done by comparing the expected and observed outcomes.
resultsBy applying linear analysis, an observed to expected ratio of 1.005 was obtained for mortality and 1.001 for morbidity. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and expected mortality rates (χ(2) = 3.54, p = 0.316) and morbidity rates (χ(2) = 2.40, p = 0.792). It was found to be comparable with other studies. The factors independently studied; perforation to operation time and presence of co-morbidity were statistically significant with respect to outcome (p<0.05).
conclusionAlthough a small sample size is the limitation of this study, POSSUM scoring system is a good indicator of postoperative outcome in patients with perforative peritonitis and was applicable in our setup. It is useful in identifying high risk patients and give preferential care to them for better outcome. Inclusion of factors like perforation to operation time and co-morbid status can improve the scoring system and better care can be provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.