ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2015
Relationship Between Motor Vehicle Collisions and Results of Perimetry, Useful Field of View, and Driving Simulation in Drivers With Glaucoma.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of contrast sensitivity on driving behaviors in individuals with moderate-to-severe glaucoma.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Eye-tracking reading patterns across different interventions in glaucoma patients versus controls.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Eye-Tracking Reading Patterns as Correlates of Clinical Measures in Glaucoma.Ophthalmic research · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Simulated Driving Performance and Rates of Progressive Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Physical Activity Is Associated with Improved Visuomotor Processing in Older Adults with Moderate and Advanced Glaucomatous Visual Field Defect: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Expansion of Peripheral Visual Field with Novel Virtual Reality Digital Spectacles.American journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Eye-Hand Coordination Impairment in Glaucoma Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Mobile Telephone Use and Reaction Time in Drivers With Glaucoma.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- Predicting Future Self-Reported Motor Vehicle Collisions in Subjects with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Using the Penalized Support Vector Machine Method.Translational vision science & technology · 2017Article
- Self-reported vs state-recorded motor vehicle collisions among older community dwelling individuals.Accident; analysis and prevention · 2017Article
- Effect of Cognitive Demand on Functional Visual Field Performance in Senior Drivers with Glaucoma.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2017Article
- A view on glaucoma--are we seeing it clearly?Eye (London, England) · 2016Article
- What rates of glaucoma progression are clinically significant?Expert review of ophthalmology · 2016Article
- Predicting Risk of Motor Vehicle Collisions in Patients with Glaucoma: A Longitudinal Study.PloS one · 2015Article
- Glaucoma and Driving License: How to Identify Patients at Risk of Revocation.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine the relationship between Motor Vehicle Collisions (MVCs) in drivers with glaucoma and standard automated perimetry (SAP), Useful Field of View (UFOV), and driving simulator assessment of divided attention.
methodsA cross-sectional study of 153 drivers from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study. All subjects had SAP and divided attention was assessed using UFOV and driving simulation using low-, medium-, and high-contrast peripheral stimuli presented during curve negotiation and car following tasks. Self-reported history of MVCs and average mileage driven were recorded.
resultsEighteen of 153 subjects (11.8%) reported a MVC. There was no difference in visual acuity but the MVC group was older, drove fewer miles, and had worse binocular SAP sensitivity, contrast sensitivity, and ability to divide attention (UFOV and driving simulation). Low contrast driving simulator tasks were the best discriminators of MVC (AUC 0.80 for curve negotiation versus 0.69 for binocular SAP and 0.59 for UFOV). Adjusting for confounding factors, longer reaction times to driving simulator divided attention tasks provided additional value compared with SAP and UFOV, with a 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in reaction time (approximately 0.75 s) associated with almost two-fold increased odds of MVC.
conclusionsReaction times to low contrast divided attention tasks during driving simulation were significantly associated with history of MVC, performing better than conventional perimetric tests and UFOV. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The association between conventional tests of visual function and MVCs in drivers with glaucoma is weak, however, tests of divided attention, particularly using driving simulation, may improve risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.