ArticleJournal of therapeutic ultrasound2015
High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation enhancement in vivo via phase-shift nanodroplets compared to microbubbles.
Article in Journal of therapeutic ultrasound, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acoustically Activatable Drug-Loaded Nanodroplets for Mechanochemical Therapy in Solid Tumors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of cavitation enhancements in low-boiling point (< -2°C) perfluorocarbon nanodroplet and microbubble mixtures using therapeutic ultrasound pulses.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Double-Emulsion Perfluorocarbon Nanodroplets for Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Image-Guided Drug Delivery and Release.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Combined Nanodrops Imaging and Ultrasound Localization Microscopy for Detecting Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Review
- Focused Ultrasound: Noninvasive Image-Guided Therapy.Investigative radiology · 2025Review
- Influence of Phase Change Droplet Activation and Microbubble Cavitation on the Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2024Article
- Acoustomechanically activatable liposomes for ultrasonic drug uncaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Weakly nonlinear focused ultrasound in viscoelastic media containing multiple bubbles.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- Harnessing Ultrasound for Targeting Drug Delivery to the Brain and Breaching the Blood-Brain Tumour Barrier.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Perfluorocarbon nanodroplet size, acoustic vaporization, and inertial cavitation affected by lipid shell composition in vitro.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Weakly nonlinear propagation of focused ultrasound in bubbly liquids with a thermal effect: Derivation of two cases of Khokolov-Zabolotskaya-Kuznetsoz equations.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2022Article
- Polyvinyl Alcohol Cryogels for Acoustic Characterization of Phase-Change Contrast Agents.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2022Article
- Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Delivery through Micro/Nanobubble-Assisted Ultrasound.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Repeated Acoustic Vaporization of Perfluorohexane Nanodroplets for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Magneto-sonothrombolysis with combination of magnetic microbubbles and nanodroplets.Ultrasonics · 2021Article
- Predicting initial nucleation events occurred in a metastable nanodroplet during acoustic droplet vaporization.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2021Article
- A Study on the Acoustic Response of Pickering Perfluoropentane Droplets in Different Media.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Perfluorocarbon Emulsion Contrast Agents: A Mini Review.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
- Comprehensive review on ultrasound-responsive theranostic nanomaterials: mechanisms, structures and medical applications.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) surgical procedures, there is a need to rapidly ablate pathological tissue while minimizing damage to healthy tissue. Current techniques are limited by relatively long procedure times and risks of off-target heating of healthy tissue. One possible solution is the use of microbubbles, which can improve the efficiency of thermal energy delivery during HIFU procedures. However, microbubbles also suffer from limitations such as low spatial selectivity and short circulation time in vivo. In this study, the use of a dual-perfluorocarbon nanodroplet that can enhance thermal ablation, yet retains high spatial selectivity and circulation half-life, was evaluated in vivo and compared to traditional microbubble agents during HIFU ablations of rat liver.
methodsHigh-intensity focused ultrasound (1.1 MHz, 4.1 MPa, 15-s continuous wave) was applied to rat liver in vivo, and heating was monitored during sonication by magnetic resonance thermometry. Thermometry data were analyzed to quantify temperature rise and ablated area, both at the target and prefocally, for HIFU applied 5, 15, or 95 min after intravenous injection of either nanodroplet or microbubble agents. Sham control experiments (no injected agents) were also performed.
resultsAt all three time points, nanodroplets significantly enhanced thermal delivery to the target, achieving temperatures 130 % higher and ablated areas 30 times larger than no-agent control sonications. Nanodroplets did not significantly enhance off-target surface heating. Microbubbles also resulted in significantly greater thermal delivery, but heating was concentrated at the proximal surface of the animal, causing skin burns. Furthermore, microbubbles resulted in lower thermal delivery to the desired target than even the control case, with the notable exception of the 95-min time point.
conclusionsResults indicate that the nanodroplet formulation studied here can substantially increase thermal delivery at the acoustic focus while avoiding prefocal heating. In contrast, microbubbles resulted in greater prefocal heating and less heating at the target. Furthermore, nanodroplets are sufficiently stable to enhance HIFU ablation in vivo for at least 1.5 h after injection. The use of a dual-perfluorocarbon nanodroplet formulation as described herein could substantially reduce HIFU procedure times without increasing the risk of skin burns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.