ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2015
BCR-ABL1 and CD66c exhibit high concordance in minimal residual disease detection of adult B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effect of sustained measurable residue disease negativity and post-remission treatment selection on the prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Flowcytometric Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- [Analysis of immunophenotypes and expressions of non-myeloid antigens in acute myeloid leukemia].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020Article
- The arginine metabolome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia can be targeted by the pegylated-recombinant arginase I BCT-100.International journal of cancer · 2018Article
- Updating recommendations of the Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry (GBCFLUX) for diagnosis of acute leukemias using four-color flow cytometry panels.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
- Minimal residual disease assessment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia by 4-color flow cytometry: Recommendations from the MRD Working Group of the Brazilian Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
- Poor Prognosis Biomolecular Factors Are Highly Frequent in Childhood Acute Leukemias From Oaxaca, Mexico.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Influence of minimal residual disease by multiparametric flow cytometry at day 15 of induction in risk stratification of children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated at a referral hospital in southern Brazil.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the relationship between surface expression of CD66c and the breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (BCR-ABL1) fusion gene in B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) at primary diagnosis, and their concordance during minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring.
methodsBone marrow biopsies were collected from newly diagnosed B-ALL patients (n = 43) between September 2011 and September 2014. Karyotyping was used to detect Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used to detect BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. Immunophenotyping was performed by flow cytometry for leukemia. Patients with both CD66c expression and BCR-ABL1 were further assessed for MRD during treatment.
resultsOverall, 26/43 (60.5%) B-ALL patients were positive for BCR-ABL1 fusion gene expression, and all Ph positive cases (17/43; 39.5%) expressed BCR-ABL1 and CD66c. CD66c was expressed at significantly higher levels in BCR-ABL1 positive than negative patients (24/26, 92.3% vs. 11/17, 64.7%; P = 0.042), and furthermore, in all Ph positive cases (17/17, 100% vs. 18/26, 69.2%; P = 0.014). When BCR-ABL1 was set as the gold standard for the presence or absence of MRD after treatment, both CD66c alone and the MRD panel including CD66c demonstrated high diagnostic performance for the detection of MRD, with values of area under the receptor operation curve (ROC) of 0.881 vs. 0.891 respectively.
conclusionsThe stable expression pattern of CD66c has noteworthy clinical value in B-ALL not only in the recognition of abnormal leukemia cells at primary diagnosis but also in monitoring of MRD during the treatment, especially in patients without definitely cytogenetic or molecular abnormal, and thus, warrants further investigation as a routine clinical marker for MRD detection by flow cytometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26045902PMC4448202W2395211615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.