ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015
A new mouse model for wound healing in hemophilia A.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activated partial thromboplastin time is a potential risk factor for prolonged chest drain placement following surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a case-control study.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Mouse models of hemostasis.Platelets · 2020Review
- Contribution of platelets, the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems to cutaneous wound healing.Thrombosis research · 2019Review
- Article
- Absence of functional compensation between coagulation factor VIII and plasminogen in double-knockout mice.Blood advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo establish a new mouse model for wound healing studies on hemophilia A.
methodsTotal 54 male mice with different genotypes including wild-type nude mice, heterozygous mice (FVIII-/-/Nu) and FVIII deficient mice (FVIII-/-) were generated and verified by PCR. Mice were subjected to wound healing research by making a 5 mm-thickness wound on mice skin and applying recombinant human epidermal growth factor (EGF, 10 μg/g) ointment, FVIII ointment (30 IU) or the ointment base to heal the wounds. Furthermore, keratinocytes were isolated from these newborn mice and subjected to migration assay by stimulation of EGF (ng/ml), insulin (10 μM) or vehicle.
resultsA new hemophilic mouse model (FVIII-/-/Nu) was constructed successfully after genotyping verified by PCR. Compared to FVIII-/- mice, FVIII-/-/Nu and Nu mice showed greater degree of wound contraction and loss of the crust. Topical treatment with EGF exhibited faster wound healing than FVIII and ointment base. Insulin treatment showed more increased migration distance than treated with EGF or vehicle. FVIII-/-/Nu mice showed greater migration than FVIII-/- and Nu mice.
conclusionsA new mouse model (FVIII-/-/Nu) for wound healing in hemophilia A was constructed, and topical treatment of insulin may be a better therapy than EGF for healing wounds in hemophilia A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26045812PMC4440121W2296943863What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.