Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26045717›Full record

ReviewPatient safety in surgery2015

Current issues in patient safety in surgery: a review.

Fernando J Kim, Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva, Diedra Gustafson, Leticia Nogueira, Timothy Harlin, David L Paul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient safety in surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patients' Perceptions of Experiences of Postoperative Chest Drain Tube Insertion: A Pilot Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. A standardized marking procedure for ENT operations to prevent wrong-site surgery: development, establishment and subsequent evaluation among patients and medical personnel.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preoperative Medical Referral Prior to Hepatopancreatic Surgery-Is It Worth it?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  13. A structured pathway for developing your complex abdominal hernia service: our York pathway.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Risk Analysis for Patient Safety in Surgical Departments: Cross-Sectional Design Usefulness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Patient handover - the poor relation of medical training?GMS journal for medical education · 2019
    Article
  19. In Search of Vital Signs: A Comparative Study of EHR Documentation.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernando J KimDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Denver, CO 80204 USA.
Rodrigo Donalisio da SilvaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Denver, CO 80204 USA.
Diedra GustafsonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Denver, CO 80204 USA.
Leticia NogueiraDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock St., Denver, CO 80204 USA.
Timothy HarlinAdministration, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, Denver, CO USA.
David L PaulDepartment of Business Information & Analytics, Daniels College of Business, University of Denver, Denver, CO USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current surgical safety guidelines and checklists are generic and are not specifically tailored to address patient issues and risk factors in surgical subspecialties. Patient safety in surgical subspecialties should be templated on general patient safety guidelines from other areas of medicine and mental health but include and develop specific processes dedicated for the care of the surgical patients. Safety redundant systems must be in place to decrease errors in surgery. Therefore, different surgical subspecialties should develop a specific curriculum in patient safety addressing training in academic centers and application of these guidelines in all practices. Clearly, redundant safety systems must be in place to decrease errors in surgery, in analogy to safety measures in other high-risk industries. Specific surgical subspecialties are encouraged to develop a specific patient safety curriculum that address training in academic centers and applicability to daily practice, with the goal of keeping our surgical patients safe in all disciplines. The present review article is designed to outline patient safety practices that should be adapted and followed to fit particular specialties.

Identifiers

PMID26045717
PMCPMC4455056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.