Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26045629›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of finance2015

The Effect of Providing Peer Information on Retirement Savings Decisions.

John Beshears, James J Choi, David Laibson, Brigitte C Madrian, Katherine L Milkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of finance, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Encouraging the resumption of economic activity after COVID-19: Evidence from a large scale-field experiment in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Psychological ownership interventions increase interest in claiming government benefits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nudging: Progress to date and future directions.Organizational behavior and human decision processes · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SAVINGS BY AND FOR THE POOR: A RESEARCH REVIEW AND AGENDA.The Review of income and wealth · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John BeshearsHarvard University and NBER, Yale University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, and University of Pennsylvania.
James J ChoiHarvard University and NBER, Yale University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, and University of Pennsylvania.
David LaibsonHarvard University and NBER, Yale University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, and University of Pennsylvania.
Brigitte C MadrianHarvard University and NBER, Yale University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, and University of Pennsylvania.
Katherine L MilkmanHarvard University and NBER, Yale University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, Harvard University and NBER, and University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Understanding and Improving Healthcare Decision-Making and Outcomes for People Living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasP01AG005842 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI KOSALI ILAYPERUMA SIMON · 1986 to 2026
$56.5M
NBER Training Program in Aging and Health EconomicsT32AG000186 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI CUTLER, DAVID M, FINKELSTEIN, AMY N. · 1989 to 2024
$9.6M
Determinants of Saving in 401(k) Plans -- ContinuationR01AG021650 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI MADRIAN, BRIGITTE C. · 2003 to 2016
$4.7M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG005842NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021650NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a field experiment in a 401(k) plan, we measure the effect of disseminating information about peer behavior on savings. Low-saving employees received simplified plan enrollment or contribution increase forms. A randomized subset of forms stated the fraction of age-matched coworkers participating in the plan or age-matched participants contributing at least 6% of pay to the plan. We document an oppositional reaction: the presence of peer information

Identifiers

PMID26045629
PMCPMC4452131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.