Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26045626›Full record

ArticleApplied physics letters2015

Electrical pulse fabrication of graphene nanopores in electrolyte solution.

Aaron T Kuan, Bo Lu, Ping Xie, Tamas Szalay, Jene A Golovchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied physics letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stress induced delamination of suspended MoSPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022
    Article
  6. Localized Nanopore Fabrication via Controlled Breakdown.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Fabrication of Nanopore in MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Noise Analysis of Monolayer Graphene Nanopores.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Monolayer WSACS nano · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aaron T KuanSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Bo LuDepartment of Physics, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Ping XieOxford Nanopore Technologies , One Kendall Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Tamas SzalaySchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Jene A Golovchenko

Funding

Electronic Sequencing in NanoporesR01HG003703 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BRANTON, DANIEL NONE, GOLOVCHENKO, JENE A · 2005 to 2014
$16.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopores in graphene membranes can potentially offer unprecedented spatial resolution for single molecule sensing, but their fabrication has thus far been difficult, poorly scalable, and prone to contamination. We demonstrate an

Identifiers

PMID26045626
PMCPMC4441703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.