ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2015
Observational Evaluations of Mice during Cerebral Microdialysis for Pediatric Brain Tumor Research.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing intact skull intrinsic signal imaging for subsequent targeted electrophysiology across mouse visual cortex.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In vivo animal experiments are critical in the process of finding and developing new treatments for children with CNS tumors. Cerebral microdialysis, which enables researchers to measure drug concentrations in the brain or tumor tissue of unanesthetized mice, is a highly specialized procedure that provides valuable information that cannot be gained by using an in vitro system. When designing any in vivo animal study, 3 Rs principles (replacement, reduction, and refinement) must be considered to ensure that the highest standards of care are followed. As part of the refinement process, the objectives of this study were to collect behavioral monitoring data from mice undergoing cerebral microdialysis, to identify any behaviors predictive of significant pain or distress that could affect the animal's welfare, and to use these data to refine the existing monitoring checklist and schedule for its use by others performing this procedure. We developed a monitoring checklist for assessing wellbeing and distress of mice during cerebral microdialysis experiments. Comparison of 79 mice that underwent cerebral microdialysis experiments with a control group of 20 mice revealed that cerebral microdialysis and tethering of mice are well tolerated for as long as 24 h with only minor evidence of stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26045457PMC4460944W2411167612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.