Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26045370›Full record

Observational studyPharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2015

Methodological considerations in assessing the effectiveness of antidepressant medication continuation during pregnancy using administrative data.

Sonja A Swanson, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Kristin Palmsten, Helen Mogun, Mark Olfson, Krista F Huybrechts

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sonja A SwansonDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sonia Hernandez-DiazDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Kristin PalmstenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego.
Helen MogunDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
Mark OlfsonNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York; the Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York.
Krista F HuybrechtsDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USColumbia University · USUniversity of San Diego · US

Funding

Dynamic strategies for the clinical management of HIV diseaseR01AI102634 · NIAID · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HERNAN, MIGUEL · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Comparative Safety of commonly prescribed Psychotropic Drugs in pregnant WomenR01MH100216 · NIMH · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, SONIA · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
Improved methods to assess the comparative safety of new psychiatric medicationsK01MH099141 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HUYBRECHTS, KRISTA F · 2013 to 2017
$882k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS018533NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI102634NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH099141NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100216NIMH NIH HHS R01MH100216PHS HHS R01 HSO18533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe decision whether to continue antidepressant use for depression during pregnancy requires weighing maternal and child risks and benefits. Little is known about the effectiveness of antidepressant therapy during pregnancy. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether standard administrative claims data can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of antidepressants.

methodsUsing prescription and healthcare visit Medicaid claims (2000-2007), we identified 28 493 women with a depression diagnosis and antidepressant fill in the 90 days before their last menstrual period. Antidepressant continuation was defined based on prescription fills during the first trimester. Depression hospitalizations and deliberate self-harm served as measures of the effectiveness of treatment continuation during pregnancy. Propensity score and instrumental variable analyses were used to attempt to account for confounding.

resultsRelative to women who discontinued antidepressant therapy, women who continued were more likely to have a depression inpatient stay (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 2.0-2.4) and deliberate self-harm code (OR = 1.4, 95%CI: 0.7-2.7). Accounting for measured covariates in the propensity score analysis, including age, race, comorbidities, comedications, features of the depression diagnosis, and antidepressant class, led to slightly attenuated estimates (OR = 2.0, 95%CI: 1.8-2.2; OR = 1.1, 95%CI: 0.5-2.4). Similar associations were estimated in subgroups with different levels of baseline depression severity. Proposed preference-time, calendar-time-based, and geography-based instruments were unlikely to meet the required conditions for a valid analysis.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that either antidepressant medications do not reduce the risk of depression relapse in pregnant women, or that administrative data alone could not be used to validly estimate the effectiveness of psychotropic medications during pregnancy.

Indexed as

MedicaidAdolescentAdultAntidepressive AgentsCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPropensity ScoreStatistics as TopicTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesYoung AdultAntidepressive Agentsadministrative dataantidepressantconfoundingeffectivenesspharmacoepidemiolgypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26045370
PMCPMC4822692
OpenAlexW1582406977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.