Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26044400›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2015

Peer-assisted teaching of basic surgical skills.

Ryan Preece, Emily Clare Dickinson, Mohamed Sherif, Yousef Ibrahim, Ann Susan Ninan, Laxmi Aildasani, Sartaj Ahmed, Philip Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Undergraduate Skills Training in Pandemic Times: Where Is the Future of Medical Education?European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Can We Use Peer-Assisted Learning to Teach Basic Surgical Skills?The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryan PreeceCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK; PreeceR@cardiff.ac.uk.
Emily Clare DickinsonCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Mohamed SherifCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Yousef IbrahimCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Ann Susan NinanCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Laxmi AildasaniCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Sartaj AhmedCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Philip SmithCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasic surgical skills training is rarely emphasised in undergraduate medical curricula. However, the provision of skills tutorials requires significant commitment from time-constrained surgical faculty. PURPOSE: We aimed to determine how a peer-assisted suturing workshop could enhance surgical skills competency among medical students and enthuse them towards a career in surgery.

methodsSenior student tutors delivered two suturing workshops to second- and third- year medical students. Suturing performance was assessed before and after teaching in a 10-min suturing exercise (variables measured included number of sutures completed, suture tension, and inter-suture distance). Following the workshop, students completed a questionnaire assessing the effect of the workshop on their suturing technique and their intention to pursue a surgical career.

resultsThirty-five students attended. Eighty-one percent believed their medical school course provided insufficient basic surgical skills training. The mean number of sutures completed post-teaching increased significantly (p < 0.001), and the standard deviation of mean inter-suture distance halved from ± 4.7 mm pre-teaching, to ± 2.6 mm post-teaching. All students found the teaching environment to be relaxed, and all felt the workshop helped to improve their suturing technique and confidence; 87% found the peer-taught workshop had increased their desire to undertake a career in surgery. DISCUSSION: Peer-assisted learning suturing workshops can enhance medical students' competence with surgical skills and inspire them towards a career in surgery. With very little staff faculty contribution, it is a cheap and sustainable way to ensure ongoing undergraduate surgical skills exposure.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePeer GroupCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEnglandHumansKnowledgeSurgical Procedures, OperativeSuture Techniquesclinical educationpeer-assisted learningsimulationsurgical educationsuturing

Identifiers

PMID26044400
PMCPMC4456402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.