ArticleBMC medical genomics2015
Identifying network biomarkers based on protein-protein interactions and expression data.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering Prognostic Biomarkers Underlying Hepatocellular Carcinoma Through Integrative Multi-Omics and a Network-Based Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Identification of diagnostic microRNAs and their target genes in multiple sclerosis based on interactome networks using an in silico approach.Current journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Statistical analysis of sequential motifs at biologically relevant protein-protein interfaces.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- DIscBIO: A User-Friendly Pipeline for Biomarker Discovery in Single-Cell Transcriptomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- e-MutPath: computational modeling reveals the functional landscape of genetic mutations rewiring interactome networks.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- A network-based predictive gene-expression signature for adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in stage II colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- Interacting partners of FEN1 and its role in the development of anticancer therapeutics.Oncotarget · 2017Review
- Omics Approaches to Identify Potential Biomarkers of Inflammatory Diseases in the Focal Adhesion Complex.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2017Review
- Mining pathway associations for disease-related pathway activity analysis based on gene expression and methylation data.BioData mining · 2017Article
- Connecting the dots in translational bioinformatics: TBC 2014 collection.BMC medical genomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying effective biomarkers to battle complex diseases is an important but challenging task in biomedical research today. Molecular data of complex diseases is increasingly abundant due to the rapid advance of high throughput technologies. However, a great gap remains in identifying the massive molecular data to phenotypic changes, in particular, at a network level, i.e., a novel method for identifying network biomarkers is in pressing need to accurately classify and diagnose diseases from molecular data and shed light on the mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Rather than seeking differential genes at an individual-molecule level, here we propose a novel method for identifying network biomarkers based on protein-protein interaction affinity (PPIA), which identify the differential interactions at a network level. Specifically, we firstly define PPIAs by estimating the concentrations of protein complexes based on the law of mass action upon gene expression data. Then we select a small and non-redundant group of protein-protein interactions and single proteins according to the PPIAs, that maximizes the discerning ability of cases from controls. This method is mathematically formulated as a linear programming, which can be efficiently solved and guarantees a globally optimal solution. Extensive results on experimental data in breast cancer demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method for identifying network biomarkers, which not only can accurately distinguish the phenotypes but also provides significant biological insights at a network or pathway level. In addition, our method provides a new way to integrate static protein-protein interaction information with dynamical gene expression data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.