Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26044206›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2015

Effects of insulin degludec and insulin glargine on day-to-day fasting plasma glucose variability in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, crossover study.

Tomoaki Nakamura, Kazuhiko Sakaguchi, Anna So, Shinsuke Nakajima, Michinori Takabe, Hisako Komada, Yoko Okuno, Yushi Hirota, Takehiro Nakamura, Keiji Iida and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Saudis Using Ambulatory Glucose Profile.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insulin Degludec in Clinical Practice: A Review of Japanese Real-World Data.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tomoaki NakamuraDivision of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
Kazuhiko Sakaguchi
Anna So
Shinsuke Nakajima
Michinori Takabe
Hisako Komada
Yoko Okuno
Yushi Hirota
Takehiro Nakamura
Keiji Iida
Michiko Kajikawa
Masao Nagata
Wataru Ogawa
Susumu Seino
Kobe University · JPEdogawa Hospital · JPShizuoka General Hospital · JPYodogawa Christian Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe compared the effects of insulin degludec (IDeg; Des(B30)LysB29(γ-Glu Nε-hexadecandioyl) human insulin) and insulin glargine (IGlar; A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin) on the day-to-day variability of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels in individuals with type 1 diabetes treated with basal-bolus insulin injections.

methodsThe effects of basal-bolus insulin therapy for 4 weeks with either IDeg or IGlar as the basal insulin in adult C-peptide-negative outpatients with type 1 diabetes were investigated in an open-label, multicentre, randomised, crossover trial. Randomisation was conducted using a centralised allocation process. The primary endpoints were the SD and CV of FPG during the final week of each treatment period. Secondary endpoints included serum glycoalbumin level, daily dose of insulin, intraday glycaemic variability and frequency of severe hypoglycaemia.

resultsThirty-six randomised participants (17 in the IDeg/IGlar and 19 in the IGlar/IDeg groups) were recruited, and data for 32 participants who completed the trial were analysed. The mean (7.74 ± 1.76 vs 8.56 ± 2.06 mmol/l; p = 0.04) and SD (2.60 ± 0.97 vs 3.19 ± 1.36 mmol/l; p = 0.03) of FPG were lower during IDeg treatment than during IGlar treatment, whereas the CV did not differ between the two treatments. The dose of IDeg was smaller than that of IGlar (11.0 ± 5.2 vs 11.8 ± 5.6 U/day; p < 0.01), but other secondary endpoints did not differ between the treatments. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationIDeg yielded a lower FPG level and smaller day-to-day variability of FPG at a lower daily dose compared with IGlar in participants with type 1 diabetes. IDeg serves as a good option for basal insulin in the treatment of type 1 diabetes.

trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network 000009965.

fundingThis research recieved no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood GlucoseC-PeptideCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingInsulin, Regular, HumanInsulin SecretionBlood GlucoseC-PeptideGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulininsulin degludecInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingInsulin, Regular, Human

Identifiers

PMID26044206
PMCPMC4526586
OpenAlexW1952276185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.