Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26044168›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2015

Evaluation of sorafenib treatment and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study using the propensity score matching method.

Kotaro Fukubayashi, Motohiko Tanaka, Kazuhiro Izumi, Takehisa Watanabe, Satomi Fujie, Takeshi Kawasaki, Yoko Yoshimaru, Masakuni Tateyama, Hiroko Setoyama, Hideaki Naoe and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kotaro FukubayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Motohiko TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kazuhiro IzumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Takehisa WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Satomi FujieDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Takeshi KawasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Yoko YoshimaruDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Masakuni TateyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Hiroko SetoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Hideaki NaoeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Ken KikuchiMedical Quality Management Center, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Yutaka SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While sorafenib (SFN) is the established worldwide standard therapeutic agent for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is also considered a favorable treatment for some advanced HCCs. This study aimed to evaluate each treatment and provide an optimal therapeutic choice for advanced HCCs. We analyzed 72 patients treated with SFN and 128 patients receiving HAIC. Both treatment groups were analyzed for prognostic and disease progression factors, and matched pair analysis was performed using the propensity score matching method. The preferable status of intrahepatic lesions, that is, no lesions or only a single (< 3 cm) intrahepetic lesion, was positively associated with good prognosis and negatively associated with disease progression in the SFN group. Maximum tumor size (> 5 cm) and low albumin (≤ 3.4 g/dL) were poor prognostic and disease progression factors in the HAIC group. Analysis of 53 patients selected from each of the SFN and HAIC groups based on the propensity score matching method showed no significant differences in survival or disease progression between the two matched subgroups. On the other hand, progression-free survival (PFS) in the HAIC-matched subgroup was significantly longer than in the SFN-matched subgroup, particularly in patients with portal vein invasion (PVI) and/or without extrahepatic spread (EHS). The treatment efficacy of HAIC is similar to that of SFN regarding survival and disease progression. Longer PFS might be expected for HAIC compared with SFN, particularly in patients with PVI and/or without EHS.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease ProgressionFemaleHepatic ArteryHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPrognosisPropensity ScoreAntineoplastic AgentsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSorafenibDisease progressionhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyhepatocellular carcinomaprognosispropensity scoresorafenib

Identifiers

PMID26044168
PMCPMC4559033
OpenAlexW2118090502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.