Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26043973›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2015

Repression of somatic cell fate in the germline.

Valérie J Robert, Steve Garvis, Francesca Palladino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dead-end (dnd) protein in fish-a review.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valérie J RobertEcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université de Lyon, 46 allée d'Italie, 69007, Lyon, France.
Steve GarvisEcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université de Lyon, 46 allée d'Italie, 69007, Lyon, France.
Francesca PalladinoEcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université de Lyon, 46 allée d'Italie, 69007, Lyon, France. francesca.palladino@ens-lyon.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germ cells must transmit genetic information across generations, and produce gametes while also maintaining the potential to form all cell types after fertilization. Preventing the activation of somatic programs is, therefore, crucial to the maintenance of germ cell identity. Studies in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and mouse have revealed both similarities and differences in how somatic gene expression is repressed in germ cells, thereby preventing their conversion into somatic tissues. This review will focus on recent developments in our understanding of how global or gene-specific transcriptional repression, chromatin regulation, and translational repression operate in the germline to maintain germ cell identity and repress somatic differentiation programs.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationModels, BiologicalAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCell DifferentiationCell LineageChromatinDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGerm CellsHumansMicePositive Transcriptional Elongation Factor BRepressor ProteinsRNA Polymerase IIBlimp-1 protein, DrosophilaChromatinDrosophila ProteinsPositive Transcriptional Elongation Factor BRepressor ProteinsRNA Polymerase IISOX17 protein, humanSOXF Transcription FactorsDifferentiationHistonesPolar granulesReprogrammingTeratomaTotipotency

Identifiers

PMID26043973
PMCPMC11113910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.