Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26043938›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews2015

Thalidomide-induced teratogenesis: history and mechanisms.

Neil Vargesson

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 309 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
309citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
27.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

309 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 860 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The βBritish journal of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

249 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil VargessonSchool of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly 60 years ago thalidomide was prescribed to treat morning sickness in pregnant women. What followed was the biggest man-made medical disaster ever, where over 10,000 children were born with a range of severe and debilitating malformations. Despite this, the drug is now used successfully to treat a range of adult conditions, including multiple myeloma and complications of leprosy. Tragically, a new generation of thalidomide damaged children has been identified in Brazil. Yet, how thalidomide caused its devastating effects in the forming embryo remains unclear. However, studies in the past few years have greatly enhanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms the drug. This review will look at the history of the drug, and the range and type of damage the drug caused, and outline the mechanisms of action the drug uses including recent molecular advances and new findings. Some of the remaining challenges facing thalidomide biologists are also discussed.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAdultAnimalsFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMalePregnancyTeratogenesisTeratogensThalidomideTeratogensThalidomideactin cytoskeletonangiogenesiscell deathcereblonFgf8limb developmentphocomeliareactive oxygen speciesShhvascular transition

Identifiers

PMID26043938
PMCPMC4737249
OpenAlexW1868158647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.