ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2015
Identification of genomic features in the classification of loss- and gain-of-function mutation.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Actually, what is a gain-of-function mutation?Genetics · 2026Article
- Interpreting the functional impact of genetic variants: The need for context qualifiers.American journal of human genetics · 2026Review
- Ligand distances as key predictors of pathogenicity and function in NMDA receptors.Human molecular genetics · 2025Article
- Recent Applications of In Silico Approaches for Studying Receptor Mutations Associated with Human Pathologies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Genome-wide prediction of pathogenic gain- and loss-of-function variants from ensemble learning of a diverse feature set.Genome medicine · 2023Article
- Mining cancer genomes for change-of-metabolic-function mutations.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Identification of discriminative gene-level and protein-level features associated with pathogenic gain-of-function and loss-of-function variants.American journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- Insight Into the Multiple Branches Traits of a Mutant inFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Heterogeneity in combined immunodeficiencies with associated or syndromic features (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Pathway analysis of genomic pathology tests for prognostic cancer subtyping.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlterations of a genome can lead to changes in protein functions. Through these genetic mutations, a protein can lose its native function (loss-of-function, LoF), or it can confer a new function (gain-of-function, GoF). However, when a mutation occurs, it is difficult to determine whether it will result in a LoF or a GoF. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a study that analyzes the genomic features of LoF and GoF instances to find features that can be used to classify LoF and GoF mutations.
methodsIn order to collect experimentally verified LoF and GoF mutational information, we obtained 816 LoF mutations and 474 GoF mutations from a literature text-mining process. Next, with data-preprocessing steps, 258 LoF and 129 GoF mutations remained for a further analysis. We analyzed the properties of these LoF and GoF mutations. Among the properties, we selected features which show different tendencies between the two groups and implemented classifications using support vector machine, random forest, and linear logistic regression methods to confirm whether or not these features can identify LoF and GoF mutations.
resultsWe analyzed the properties of the LoF and GoF mutations and identified six features which have discriminative power between LoF and GoF conditions: the reference allele, the substituted allele, mutation type, mutation impact, subcellular location, and protein domain. When using the six selected features with the random forest, support vector machine, and linear logistic regression classifiers, the result showed accuracy levels of 72.23%, 71.28%, and 70.19%, respectively.
conclusionsWe analyzed LoF and GoF mutations and selected several properties which were different between the two classes. By implementing classifications with the selected features, it is demonstrated that the selected features have good discriminative power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.