ArticlePloS one2015
GJB2 Mutation Spectrum and Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in 1067 Han Chinese Subjects with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- External quality assessment of genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss in Shanghai and other regions.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Saliva Sample-Based Non-Invasive Carrier Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Hereditary Hearing Loss, and Thalassemia in 13,926 Women of Reproductive Age From South Zhejiang.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Genetic Landscape of Hearing Loss in the Caribbean: A Narrative Review.Balkan medical journal · 2024Review
- Establishment and application of a reverse dot blot assay for 13 mutations of hearing-loss genes in primary hospitals in China.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2024Article
- Article
- Dispersed DNA variants underlie hearing loss in South Florida's minority population.Human genomics · 2023Article
- Clinical application value of expanded carrier screening in the population of childbearing age.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Phenotypes ofBiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Connexin Mutations and Hereditary Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A capillary electrophoresis-based multiplex PCR assay for expanded carrier screening in the eastern Han Chinese population.NPJ genomic medicine · 2022Article
- Mutations of MAP1B encoding a microtubule-associated phosphoprotein cause sensorineural hearing loss.JCI insight · 2020Article
- Low penetrance of hearing loss in two Chinese families carrying the mitochondrial tRNASer(UCN) mutations.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- Molecular epidemiology of Chinese Han deaf patients with bi-allelic and mono-allelic GJB2 mutations.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- First-Line Molecular Genetic Evaluation of Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss.Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2019Article
- Identification of Main Genetic Causes Responsible for Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss in a Peruvian Population.Genes · 2019Article
- A Novel Nonsense Mutation (c.414G>A; p.Trp138*) inFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Article
- Calcium interactions with Cx26 hemmichannel: Spatial association between MD simulations biding sites and variant pathogenicity.Computational biology and chemistry · 2018Article
- Genes important for otoneurological diagnostic purposes - current status and future prospects.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutations in Gap Junction Beta 2 (GJB2) have been reported to be a major cause of non-syndromic hearing loss in many populations worldwide. The spectrums and frequencies of GJB2 variants vary substantially among different ethnic groups, and the genotypes among these populations remain poorly understood. In the present study, we carried out a systematic and extended mutational screening of GJB2 gene in 1067 Han Chinese subjects with non-syndromic hearing loss, and the resultant GJB2 variants were evaluated by phylogenetic, structural and bioinformatic analysis. A total of 25 (23 known and 2 novel) GJB2 variants were identified, including 6 frameshift mutations, 1 nonsense mutation, 16 missense mutations and 2 silent mutations. In this cohort, c.235delC is the most frequently observed pathogenic mutation. The phylogenetic, structural and bioinformatic analysis showed that 2 novel variants c.127G>T (p.V43L), c.293G>C (p.R98P) and 2 known variants c. 107T>C (p.L36P) and c.187G>T (p.V63L) are localized at highly conserved amino acids. In addition, these 4 mutations are absent in 203 healthy individuals, therefore, they are probably the most likely candidate pathogenic mutations. In addition, 66 (24 novel and 42 known) genotypes were identified, including 6 homozygotes, 20 compound heterozygotes, 18 single heterozygotes, 21 genotypes harboring only polymorphism(s) and the wild type genotype. Among these, 153 (14.34%) subjects were homozygous for pathogenic mutations, 63 (5.91%) were compound heterozygotes, and 157 (14.71%) carried single heterozygous mutation. Furthermore, 65.28% (141/216) of these cases with two pathogenic mutations exhibited profound hearing loss. These data suggested that mutations in GJB2 gene are responsible for approximately 34.96% of non-syndromic hearing loss in Han Chinese population from Zhejiang Province in eastern China. In addition, our results also strongly supported the idea that other factors such as alterations in regulatory regions, additional genes, and environmental factors may contribute to the clinical manifestation of deafness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.