Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26043031›Full record

ArticleNutrients2015

A comparison of postoperative early enteral nutrition with delayed enteral nutrition in patients with esophageal cancer.

Gongchao Wang, Hongbo Chen, Jun Liu, Yongchen Ma, Haiyong Jia

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gongchao WangSchool of Nursing, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan 250012, China. wanggongchao@126.com.
Hongbo ChenSchool of Nursing, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan 250012, China. dabo1988@126.com.
Jun LiuSchool of Nursing, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan 250012, China. liujunangel@163.com.
Yongchen MaSchool of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan 250012, China. myc88587479@hotmail.com.
Haiyong JiaDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutica Sciences, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan 250012, China. 502378774@163.com.
Shandong University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined esophageal cancer patients who received enteral nutrition (EN) to evaluate the validity of early EN compared to delayed EN, and to determine the appropriate time to start EN. A total of 208 esophagectomy patients who received EN postoperatively were divided into three groups (Group 1, 2 and 3) based on whether they received EN within 48 h, 48 h-72 h or more than 72 h, respectively. The postoperative complications, length of hospital stay (LOH), days for first fecal passage, cost of hospitalization, and the difference in serum albumin values between pre-operation and post-operation were all recorded. The statistical analyses were performed using the t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test and the chi square test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Group 1 had the lowest thoracic drainage volume, the earliest first fecal passage, and the lowest LOH and hospitalization expenses of the three groups. The incidence of pneumonia was by far the highest in Group 3 (p = 0.019). Finally, all the postoperative outcomes of nutritional conditions were the worst by a significant margin in Group 3. It is therefore safe and valid to start early enteral nutrition within 48 h for postoperative esophageal cancer patients.

Indexed as

AgedEnteral NutritionEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodSerum AlbuminTreatment OutcomeSerum Albumindelayed enteral nutritionearly enteral nutritionesophageal cancerpostoperative complication

Identifiers

PMID26043031
PMCPMC4488785
OpenAlexW2112459194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.