Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26042934›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Oncogenic CXCL10 signalling drives metastasis development and poor clinical outcome.

S C Wightman, A Uppal, S P Pitroda, S Ganai, B Burnette, M Stack, G Oshima, S Khan, X Huang, M C Posner and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S C WightmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
A UppalDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
S P Pitroda1] Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA [2] Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 9006, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
S GanaiDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
B BurnetteDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
M StackDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
G OshimaDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
S KhanDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
X Huang1] Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA [2] Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 9006, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
M C Posner1] Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA [2] Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 9006, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
R R Weichselbaum1] Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA [2] Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 9006, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
N N Khodarev1] Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA [2] Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 9006, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe CXCL10/CXCR3 signalling mediates paracrine interactions between tumour and stromal cells that govern leukocyte trafficking and angiogenesis. Emerging data implicate noncanonical CXCL10/CXCR3 signalling in tumourigenesis and metastasis. However, little is known regarding the role for autocrine CXCL10/CXCR3 signalling in regulating the metastatic potential of individual tumour clones.

methodsWe performed transcriptomic and cytokine profiling to characterise the functions of CXCL10 and CXCR3 in tumour cells with different metastatic abilities. We modulated the expression of the CXCL10/CXCR3 pathway using shRNA-mediated silencing in both in vitro and in vivo models of B16F1 melanoma. In addition, we examined the expression of CXCL10 and CXCR3 and their associations with clinical outcomes in clinical data sets derived from over 670 patients with melanoma and colon and renal cell carcinomas.

resultsWe identified a critical role for autocrine CXCL10/CXCR3 signalling in promoting tumour cell growth, motility and metastasis. Analysis of publicly available clinical data sets demonstrated that coexpression of CXCL10 and CXCR3 predicted an increased metastatic potential and was associated with early metastatic disease progression and poor overall survival.

conclusionThese findings support the potential for CXCL10/CXCR3 coexpression as a predictor of metastatic recurrence and point towards a role for targeting of this oncogenic axis in the treatment of metastatic disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationChemokine CXCL10MiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasm MetastasisReceptors, CXCR3Signal TransductionChemokine CXCL10CXCL10 protein, humanCXCR3 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR3

Identifiers

PMID26042934
PMCPMC4506383
OpenAlexW1492111426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.