ArticleScientific reports2015
Three-dimensional virtual surgery models for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization strategies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do 3D Printing Models Improve Anatomical Teaching About Hepatic Segments to Medical Students? A Randomized Controlled Study.World journal of surgery · 2016Trial
- Randomized Comparison of the Crush Versus the Culotte Stenting for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions.Chinese medical journal · 2016Trial
- 3D printing based on cardiac CT assists anatomic visualization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyTrial
- Sutureless vascular anastomotic approaches and their potential impacts.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Endothelial and smooth muscle cell interaction with hydrothermally treated titanium surfaces.In vitro models · 2024Article
- Effects of Drag-Reducing Polymers on Hemodynamics and Whole Blood-Endothelial Interactions in 3D-Printed Vascular Topologies.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes following ostial left anterior descending artery intervention with or without crossover to left-main.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2022Article
- 3D Printing-A Cutting Edge Technology for Treating Post-Infarction Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- 3D Printing for Cardiovascular Applications: From End-to-End Processes to Emerging Developments.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Review
- Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific 3D Printed Models in Cardiovascular Disease: Current Status and Future Directions.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- Three-dimensional printing for cardiovascular diseases: from anatomical modeling to dynamic functionality.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Review
- Clinical situations for which 3D printing is considered an appropriate representation or extension of data contained in a medical imaging examination: adult cardiac conditions.3D printing in medicine · 2020Article
- Application of three-dimensional printing in interventional medicine.Journal of interventional medicine · 2020Article
- Personalized Three-Dimensional Printed Models in Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- 3D printing in medicine: current applications and future directions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018Article
- The Various Applications of 3D Printing in Cardiovascular Diseases.Current cardiology reports · 2018Review
- Recent Advances in Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Role of Science and Technology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Fabrication of truly 3D microfluidic channel using 3D-printed soluble mold.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
- Predictive Physiological Modeling of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Is Virtual Treatment Planning the Future?Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
- Clinical Applications of 3D Printing: Primer for Radiologists.Academic radiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially coronary stent implantation, has been shown to be an effective treatment for coronary artery disease. However, in-stent restenosis is one of the longstanding unsolvable problems following PCI. Although stents implanted inside narrowed vessels recover normal flux of blood flows, they instantaneously change the wall shear stress (WSS) distribution on the vessel surface. Improper stent implantation positions bring high possibilities of restenosis as it enlarges the low WSS regions and subsequently stimulates more epithelial cell outgrowth on vessel walls. To optimize the stent position for lowering the risk of restenosis, we successfully established a digital three-dimensional (3-D) model based on a real clinical coronary artery and analysed the optimal stenting strategies by computational simulation. Via microfabrication and 3-D printing technology, the digital model was also converted into in vitro microfluidic models with 3-D micro channels. Simultaneously, physicians placed real stents inside them; i.e., they performed "virtual surgeries". The hydrodynamic experimental results showed that the microfluidic models highly inosculated the simulations. Therefore, our study not only demonstrated that the half-cross stenting strategy could maximally reduce restenosis risks but also indicated that 3-D printing combined with clinical image reconstruction is a promising method for future angiocardiopathy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.