Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26042418›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Eukaryote-Made Thermostable DNA Polymerase Enables Rapid PCR-Based Detection of Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma and Other Bacteria in the Amniotic Fluid of Preterm Labor Cases.

Tomohiro Ueno, Hideki Niimi, Noriko Yoneda, Satoshi Yoneda, Masashi Mori, Homare Tabata, Hiroshi Minami, Shigeru Saito, Isao Kitajima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Treatment strategies for intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation in preterm labor cases.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tomohiro UenoClinical Laboratory Center, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Hideki NiimiClinical Laboratory Center, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Noriko YonedaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Satoshi YonedaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Masashi MoriResearch Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University, Ishikawa, 921-8836, Japan.
Homare TabataLife Science Center, Hokkaido Mitsui Chemicals, Inc., Hokkaido, 073-0138, Japan.
Hiroshi MinamiLife Science Center, Hokkaido Mitsui Chemicals, Inc., Hokkaido, 073-0138, Japan.
Shigeru SaitoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Isao KitajimaClinical Laboratory Center, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Toyama University Hospital · JPMitsui Chemicals (Japan) · JPIshikawa Prefectural University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-amniotic infection has long been recognized as the leading cause of preterm delivery. Microbial culture is the gold standard for the detection of intra-amniotic infection, but several days are required, and many bacterial species in the amniotic fluid are difficult to cultivate.

methodsWe developed a novel nested-PCR-based assay for detecting Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, other bacteria and fungi in amniotic fluid samples within three hours of sample collection. To detect prokaryotes, eukaryote-made thermostable DNA polymerase, which is free from bacterial DNA contamination, is used in combination with bacterial universal primers. In contrast, to detect eukaryotes, conventional bacterially-made thermostable DNA polymerase is used in combination with fungal universal primers. To assess the validity of the PCR assay, we compared the PCR and conventional culture results using 300 amniotic fluid samples.

resultsBased on the detection level (positive and negative), 93.3% (280/300) of Mycoplasma, 94.3% (283/300) of Ureaplasma, 89.3% (268/300) of other bacteria and 99.7% (299/300) of fungi matched the culture results. Meanwhile, concerning the detection of bacteria other than Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma, 228 samples were negative according to the PCR method, 98.2% (224/228) of which were also negative based on the culture method. Employing the devised primer sets, mixed amniotic fluid infections of Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma and/or other bacteria could be clearly distinguished. In addition, we also attempted to compare the relative abundance in 28 amniotic fluid samples with mixed infection, and judged dominance by comparing the Ct values of quantitative real-time PCR.

conclusionsWe developed a novel PCR assay for the rapid detection of Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, other bacteria and fungi in amniotic fluid samples. This assay can also be applied to accurately diagnose the absence of bacteria in samples. We believe that this assay will positively contribute to the treatment of intra-amniotic infection and the prevention of preterm delivery.

Indexed as

TemperatureAdolescentAdultAmniotic FluidDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersEnzyme StabilityEukaryotic CellsFemaleFungiHumansMycoplasmaObstetric Labor, PrematurePolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26042418
PMCPMC4456152
OpenAlexW1523278280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.