ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2015
Project Stakeholder Management in the Clinical Research Environment: How to Do it Right.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of peer-delivered sleep health education and social support in increasing OSA evaluation among at-risk blacks.Journal of sleep research · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Codevelopment of a Digital Screening and Intervention Tool to Improve Lifestyle Habits in Children: Focus Group Study With Parents and Clinicians.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Ethical Imperatives for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Clinical Nursing: Viewpoint on Responsible AI Use.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Research Priorities of Individuals and Families With Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Article
- Stakeholders' perspective on inclusion of key populations unique identifier codes in routine health information management system in South Africa.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2025Article
- Research Priorities of Individuals and Families with Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- A health technology assessment of COVID-19 vaccination for Nigerian decision-makers: Identifying stakeholders and pathways to support evidence uptake.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Frontline Clinician Appraisement of Research Engagement: "I feel out of touch with research".Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Appropriateness and Feasibility of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Lessons Learned to Building Stakeholder Engagement during the Initial Stages of Pragmatic Research Development and Implementation.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2021Article
- Multistakeholder Participation in Disaster Management-The Case of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A mixed-methods community-based participatory research to explore stakeholder's perspectives and to quantify the effect of crop residue burning on air and human health in Central India: study protocol.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Review
- Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2017Article
- Methods guiding stakeholder engagement in planning a pragmatic study on changing stroke systems of care.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
- Organizational Ethics Indicators in Iranian Hospital: An Importance-Performance Analysis.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review introduces a conceptual framework for understanding stakeholder management (ShM) in the clinical and community-based research environment. In recent years, an evolution in practice has occurred in many applicants for public and non-governmental funding of public health research in hospital settings. Community health research projects are inherently complex, have sought to involve patients and other stakeholders in the center of the research process. Substantial evidence has now been provided that stakeholder involvement is essential for management effectiveness in clinical research. Feedback from stakeholders has critical value for research managers inasmuch as it alerts them to the social, environmental, and ethical implications of research activities. Additionally, those who are directly affected by program development and clinical research, the patients, their families, and others, almost universally have a strong motivation to be involved in the planning and execution of new program changes. The current overview introduces a conceptual framework for ShM in the clinical research environment and offers practical suggestions for fostering meaningful stakeholder engagement. The fifth edition of PMBOK(®) of the Project Management Institute, has served as basis for many of the suggested guidelines that are put forward in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.