Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26041933›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2015

Oomycete interactions with plants: infection strategies and resistance principles.

Stuart Fawke, Mehdi Doumane, Sebastian Schornack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Insights into the association ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Infection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessing the Sensitivity ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stuart FawkeSainsbury Laboratory (SLCU), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9669-1245
Mehdi DoumaneSainsbury Laboratory (SLCU), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sebastian SchornackSainsbury Laboratory (SLCU), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom sebastian.schornack@slcu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7836-5881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Oomycota include many economically significant microbial pathogens of crop species. Understanding the mechanisms by which oomycetes infect plants and identifying methods to provide durable resistance are major research goals. Over the last few years, many elicitors that trigger plant immunity have been identified, as well as host genes that mediate susceptibility to oomycete pathogens. The mechanisms behind these processes have subsequently been investigated and many new discoveries made, marking a period of exciting research in the oomycete pathology field. This review provides an introduction to our current knowledge of the pathogenic mechanisms used by oomycetes, including elicitors and effectors, plus an overview of the major principles of host resistance: the established R gene hypothesis and the more recently defined susceptibility (S) gene model. Future directions for development of oomycete-resistant plants are discussed, along with ways that recent discoveries in the field of oomycete-plant interactions are generating novel means of studying how pathogen and symbiont colonizations overlap.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalDisease ResistanceGenes, PlantHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, InnateOomycetesPhylogenyPlant Diseases

Identifiers

PMID26041933
PMCPMC4468149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.