Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26041927›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Role of input correlations in shaping the variability and noise correlations of evoked activity in the neocortex.

Alejandro F Bujan, Ad Aertsen, Arvind Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cortical Variability and Challenges for Modeling Approaches.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  13. Correlations and Neuronal Population Information.Annual review of neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandro F BujanFaculty of Biology, and Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany, and afbujan@gmail.com arvkumar@kth.se.
Ad AertsenFaculty of Biology, and Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany, and.
Arvind KumarFaculty of Biology, and Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany, and Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden afbujan@gmail.com arvkumar@kth.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-9195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent analysis of evoked activity recorded across different brain regions and tasks revealed a marked decrease in noise correlations and trial-by-trial variability. Given the importance of correlations and variability for information processing within the rate coding paradigm, several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the reduction in these quantities despite an increase in firing rates. These models suggest that anatomical clusters and/or tightly balanced excitation-inhibition can generate intrinsic network dynamics that may exhibit a reduction in noise correlations and trial-by-trial variability when perturbed by an external input. Such mechanisms based on the recurrent feedback crucially ignore the contribution of feedforward input to the statistics of the evoked activity. Therefore, we investigated how statistical properties of the feedforward input shape the statistics of the evoked activity. Specifically, we focused on the effect of input correlation structure on the noise correlations and trial-by-trial variability. We show that the ability of neurons to transfer the input firing rate, correlation, and variability to the output depends on the correlations within the presynaptic pool of a neuron, and that an input with even weak within-correlations can be sufficient to reduce noise correlations and trial-by-trial variability, without requiring any specific recurrent connectivity structure. In general, depending on the ongoing activity state, feedforward input could either increase or decrease noise correlation and trial-by-trial variability. Thus, we propose that evoked activity statistics are jointly determined by the feedforward and feedback inputs.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalModels, NeurologicalNoiseStatistics as TopicAction PotentialsComputer SimulationHumansNeocortexNerve NetNeuronsattentionevoked activityfeedforward inputsnetwork dynamicsnoise correlationstrial-by-trial variability

Identifiers

PMID26041927
PMCPMC6605325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.