Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26041891›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Performance of a Noninvasive Test for Detecting Mycobacterium bovis Shedding in European Badger (Meles meles) Populations.

Hayley C King, Andrew Murphy, Phillip James, Emma Travis, David Porter, Jason Sawyer, Jennifer Cork, Richard J Delahay, William Gaze, Orin Courtenay and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. DoesVeterinary medicine international · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Can We Breed Cattle for Lower Bovine TB Infectivity?Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Article
  14. The History ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hayley C KingUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom Warwick Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom hayley.king@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-8020
Andrew MurphyUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Phillip JamesUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Emma TravisUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom.
David PorterUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Jason SawyerAnimal and Plant Health Agency Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Jennifer CorkAnimal and Plant Health Agency Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Richard J DelahayNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodchester Park, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.
William GazeEuropean Centre for Environmental and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Orin CourtenayUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom Warwick Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth M WellingtonUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of Mycobacterium bovis, the causative agent of bovine tuberculosis, in cattle herds in the United Kingdom is increasing, resulting in substantial economic losses. The European badger (Meles meles) is implicated as a wildlife reservoir and is the subject of control measures aimed at reducing the incidence of infection in cattle populations. Understanding the epidemiology of M. bovis in badger populations is essential for directing control interventions and understanding disease spread; however, accurate diagnosis in live animals is challenging and currently uses invasive methods. Here we present a noninvasive diagnostic procedure and sampling regimen using field sampling of latrines and detection of M. bovis with quantitative PCR tests, the results of which strongly correlate with the results of immunoassays in the field at the social group level. This method allows M. bovis infections in badger populations to be monitored without trapping and provides additional information on the quantities of bacterial DNA shed. Therefore, our approach may provide valuable insights into the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis in badger populations and inform disease control interventions.

Indexed as

Bacterial SheddingDisease ReservoirsAnimalsCattleFecesMustelidaeMycobacterium bovisTuberculosisUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26041891
PMCPMC4473191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.