Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26041487›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Is traditional Chinese medicine recommended in Western medicine clinical practice guidelines in China? A systematic analysis.

Jun Ren, Xun Li, Jin Sun, Mei Han, Guo-Yan Yang, Wen-Yuan Li, Nicola Robinson, George Lewith, Jian-Ping Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. GRADE Methods in traditional medicine.Integrative medicine research · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jun RenCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xun LiCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jin SunCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mei HanCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Guo-Yan YangCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wen-Yuan LiCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Nicola RobinsonFaculty of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK.
George LewithComplementary and Integrated Medicine Research Unit, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton University, Southampton, UK.
Jian-Ping LiuCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China NAFKAM, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based medicine promotes and relies on the use of evidence in developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). The Chinese healthcare system includes both traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine, which are expected to be equally reflected in Chinese CPGs.

objectiveTo evaluate the inclusion of TCM-related information in Western medicine CPGs developed in China and the adoption of high level evidence.

methodsAll CPGs were identified from the China Guideline Clearinghouse (CGC), which is the main Chinese organisation maintaining the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health of China, the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Medical Doctors' Association.TCM-related contents were extracted from all the CPGs identified. Extracted information comprised the institution issuing the guideline, date of issue, disease, recommendations relating to TCM, evidence level of the recommended content and references supporting the recommendations.

resultsA total of 604 CPGs were identified, only a small number of which (74/604; 12%) recommended TCM therapy and only five guidelines (7%) had applied evidence grading. The 74 CPGs involved 13 disease systems according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition. TCM was mainly recommended in the treatment part of the guidelines (73/74, 99%), and more than half of the recommendations (43/74, 58%) were related to Chinese herbal medicine (single herbs or herbal treatment based on syndrome differentiation).

conclusionsFew Chinese Western medicine CPGs recommend TCM therapies and very few provide evidence grading for the TCM recommendation. We suggest that future guideline development should be based on systematic searches for evidence to support CPG recommendations and involve a multidisciplinary approach including TCM expertise.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineMedicine, Chinese TraditionalPractice Patterns, Physicians'ChinaDelivery of Health CareDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansDrugs, Chinese HerbalCOMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)TRANSPLANT MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26041487
PMCPMC4458581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.