Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26041469›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

Systematic review of models assessing the economic value of routine varicella and herpes zoster vaccination in high-income countries.

Oliver Damm, Bernhard Ultsch, Johannes Horn, Rafael T Mikolajczyk, Wolfgang Greiner, Ole Wichmann

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Global impact of varicella vaccination programs.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Varicella vaccination - the global experience.Expert review of vaccines · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver DammDepartment of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. oliver.damm@uni-bielefeld.de.
Bernhard UltschImmunisation Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. ultschb@rki.de.
Johannes HornHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany. johannes.horn@helmholtz-hzi.de.
Rafael T MikolajczykHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Brunswick, Germany. rafael.mikolajczyk@helmholtz-hzi.de.
Wolfgang GreinerDepartment of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. wolfgang.greiner@uni-bielefeld.de.
Ole WichmannImmunisation Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. wichmanno@rki.de.
Bielefeld University · DERobert Koch Institute · DEHelmholtz Association of German Research Centres · DEHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA systematic review was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of routine varicella and herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination in high-income countries estimated by modelling studies.

methodsA PubMed search was performed to identify relevant studies published before October 2013. Studies were included in the review if they (i) evaluated the cost-effectiveness of routine childhood or adolescent varicella vaccination and/or HZ vaccination targeting the elderly, and if they (ii) reported results for high-income countries.

resultsA total of 38 model-based studies were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Routine childhood or adolescent varicella vaccination was cost-effective or cost-saving from a payer perspective and always cost-saving from a societal perspective when ignoring its potential impact on HZ incidence due to reduced or absent exogenous boosting. The inclusion of the potential impact of childhood varicella vaccination on HZ led to net quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) losses or incremental cost-effectiveness ratios exceeding commonly accepted thresholds. Additional HZ vaccination could partially mitigate this effect. Studies focusing only on the evaluation of HZ vaccination reported a wide range of results depending on the selected target age-group and the vaccine price, but most found HZ vaccination to be a cost-effective or marginally cost-effective intervention. Cost-effectiveness of HZ vaccination was strongly dependent on the age at vaccination, the price of the vaccine, the assumed duration of protection and the applied cost per QALY threshold.

conclusionsWhile HZ vaccination is mostly considered cost-effective, cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination primarily depends on the in- or exclusion of exogenous boosting in the model. As a consequence, clarification on the role of exogenous boosting is crucial for decision-making regarding varicella vaccination.

Indexed as

Age FactorsChickenpoxChickenpox VaccineCommerceCost-Benefit AnalysisDeveloped CountriesHerpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineHumansIncidenceQuality-Adjusted Life YearsChickenpox VaccineHerpes Zoster Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID26041469
PMCPMC4455277
OpenAlexW1849751932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.